No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Warmth and competence as distinct dimensions of value in social emotions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2017
Abstract
Gervais & Fessler's analysis collapses across two orthogonal dimensions of social value to explain contempt: relational value, predicted by cooperation, and agentic value, predicted by status. These dimensions interact to potentiate specific social emotions and behaviors in intergroup contexts. By neglecting the unique roles of these dimensions – and their associated attributes: warmth and competence – the sentiment framework cedes predictive precision.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Cikara, M., Farnsworth, R. A., Harris, L. T. & Fiske, S. T. (2010) On the wrong side of the trolley track: Neural correlates of relative social valuation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
5:404–13.Google Scholar
Cikara, M. & Fiske, S. T. (2011) Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets' (mis)fortunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
23(12):3791–803.Google Scholar
Cikara, M. & Fiske, S. T. (2012) Stereotypes and Schadenfreude: Affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science
3(1):63–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cikara, M. & Fiske, S. T. (2013) Their pain, our pleasure: Stereotype content and Schadenfreude. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
1299:52–59.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. (2007) The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
92(4):631–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, M. (2006) Cooperation and competition. In: The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, ed. Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T. & Marcus, E. C., pp. 23–42. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. & Glick, P. (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
11(2):77–83.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
82(6):878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. & Ruscher, J. B. (1993) Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In: Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception, ed. Mackie, D. M. & Hamilton, D. L., pp. 239–68. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glick, P. (2002) Sacrificial lambs in wolves clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and scapegoating of Jews. In: What social psychology can tell us about the Holocaust, ed. Newman, L. S. & Erber, R., pp. 113–42. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989) Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. (2000) Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
79(4):602–16. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R. & Sherif, C. W. (1954/1961) Intergroup cooperation and competition: The Robbers Cave experiment. University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Struch, N. & Schwartz, S. H. (1989) Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
56:364–73.Google Scholar
Target article
On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”
Related commentaries (26)
A sentimental education: The place of sentiments in personality and social psychology
Above and below the surface: Genetic and cultural factors in the development of values
Affect in social media: The role of audience and the presence of contempt in cyberbullying
Are sentiments subject to selection pressures? The case of oxytocin
Attitude–Scenario–Emotion (ASE) sentiments are superficial
Building a house of sentiment on sand: Epistemological issues with contempt
Constructing contempt
Contempt as the absence of appraisal, not recognition, respect
Contempt – Where the modularity of the mind meets the modularity of the brain?
Contempt, like any other social affect, can be an emotion as well as a sentiment
Deep mechanisms of social affect – Plastic parental brain mechanisms for sensitivity versus contempt
Dominance as a competence domain, and the evolutionary origins of respect and contempt
From disgust to contempt-speech: The nature of contempt on the map of prejudicial emotions
Further implications in analyzing contempt in modern society
How dare you not recognize the role of my contempt? Insight from experimental psychopathology
Including pride and its group-based, relational, and contextual features in theories of contempt
Is humility a sentiment?
On the substantial contribution of “contempt” as a folk affect concept to the history of the European popular institution of charivari
Oxytocin shapes the priorities and neural representations of attitudes and values
Prejudice is a general evaluation, not a specific emotion
Sentiments and the motivational psychology of parental care
Socioecological factors are linked to changes in prevalence of contempt over time
Two kinds of respect for two kinds of contempt: Why contempt can be both a sentiment and an emotion
Warmth and competence as distinct dimensions of value in social emotions
Warmth, competence, and closeness may provide more empirically grounded starts for a theory of sentiments
We need more precise, quantitative models of sentiments
Author response
Seeing the elephant: Parsimony, functionalism, and the emergent design of contempt and other sentiments