Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:54:06.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The hows and whys of “we” (and “I”) in groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2016

Amanda J. Barnier
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia. amanda.barnier@mq.edu.aucelia.harris@mq.edu.aujohn.sutton@mq.edu.auhttp://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=180http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=190http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=237
Celia B. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia. amanda.barnier@mq.edu.aucelia.harris@mq.edu.aujohn.sutton@mq.edu.auhttp://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=180http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=190http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=237
John Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia. amanda.barnier@mq.edu.aucelia.harris@mq.edu.aujohn.sutton@mq.edu.auhttp://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=180http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=190http://www.cogsci.mq.edu.au/members/profile.php?memberID=237

Abstract

Informed by our interdisciplinary research program on collaborative recall, we argue that Baumeister et al. should consider: (1) group success as a balance between differentiation and integration (not differentiation alone); (2) variation in constellations of people and processes within and across groups; and (3) nuanced measurement of what people bring to, do in, and get out of groups.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnier, A. J. (2010) Memories, memory studies, and my iPhone. Memory Studies 3(4):293–97.Google Scholar
Barnier, A. J., Priddis, A. C., Broekhuijse, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. K., Cox, R., Congleton, A. R. & Addis, D. R. (2014) Reaping what they sow: The benefits of remembering together in intimate couples. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 3(4), 261–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B. & Wilson, R. A. (2008) A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory [Special Issue]. Cognitive Systems Research: Perspectives on Social Cognition 9(1):3351.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J. & Keil, P. G. (2014a) Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Studies 7(3):285–97.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J., Barnier, A. & McIlwain, D. (2011) We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes 48:267303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M. & Kemp, R. I. (2008) Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? [Special Issue]. Memory: Collective Memory: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches 16:213–30.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Rasmussen, A. S. & Berntsen, D. (2014b) The functions of autobiographical memory: An integrative approach. Memory 22:559–81.Google Scholar
Hirst, W. & Echterhoff, G. (2012) Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology 63:5579.Google Scholar
Sutton, J., Harris, C., Keil, P. & Barnier, A. (2010) The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9(4):521–60.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of group behavior, ed. Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R., pp. 185208. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar