Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:52:43.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the substantial contribution of “contempt” as a folk affect concept to the history of the European popular institution of charivari

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Bogdan Neagota ,
Ileana Benga  and
Oana Benga
Bogdan Neagota
Affiliation:
Department of Classical Philology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 400038, Romania. bogdan.neagota@gmail.com
Ileana Benga
Affiliation:
Department for Folklore Studies, Romanian Academy of Sciences, Cluj-Napoca 400015, Romania. ileanabenga@gmail.com
Oana Benga
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 400015, Romania. oanabenga@gmail.comwww.orma.rowww.psychology.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The integration of the folk affect concept of “contempt” into the analysis of the complex institution known generally as charivari is mutually beneficial for both ethno-anthropology (which may thus access inner causes for disputed social and collective behaviors) and evolutionary psychology (which may thus study the length of tradition together with the width of the institution spread, serving the same social functions).

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhtin, M. (1965/1984) Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barillari, S. M. (2001) Introduzione. In: La leggenda del cacciatore furioso e della caccia selvaggia [The legend of the wild hunter and of the wild hunt] (1935), by Meisen, K., ed. Barillari, S. M., pp. 5–28. Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Benga, I. (2011) Povestirile Roşiei Montane [Tales of Roşia Montană]. Galaxia Gutenberg.Google Scholar
Benga, I. (2015) “I'm stabbing you, I'm stabbing you not”: Tales of witches, their gatherings, magic thefts and wrestles around Roșia Montană, România. Towards a modal biography of the local witch type. In: Il canto di Orfeo: Poesia – Rito – Magia, ed. Barillari, S. M. & Castelli, F., pp. 99–131. Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Benga, I. & Benga, O. (2006) What else is driving ritualized behaviour, besides the “hazard–precaution system”? Developmental, psychopathological, and ethnological considerations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29(6):615–16.Google Scholar
Benga, O., Neagota, B. & Benga, I. (2015) The importance of the rites of passage in assigning semantic structures to autobiographical memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38:20–21.Google Scholar
Boiteux, M. (1981) Dérision et deviance: Apropos de quelques coutumes romaines. In: Le Charivari, ed. Le Goff, J. & Schmitt, J.-Cl., pp. 237–49. Mouton.Google Scholar
Castelli, F. (2004) Charivari, Scampanata, Ciabra, ovvero il “gioco d'Acheronte.” Introduzione [Introduction]. In: Charivari: Mascherate di vivi e di morti [Charivari: Masks of the living and of the dead], ed. Castelli, F.. Atti del V Convegno Internazionale, Rocca Grimalda, 7–8 Ottobre 2000, pp. VII–LXIII. Edizioni dell'Orso.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (1981) Charivari, associations juvéniles, chasse sauvage. In: Le Charivari, ed. Le Goff, J. & Schmitt, J.-C., pp. 131–40. Mouton.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C (1989/1996) Istorie nocturnă: O interpretare a Sabatului [Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches' Sabbath] , trans. Avădanei, M.. Polirom. (Original English publication in 1989).Google Scholar
Karnoouh, C. (1981) Le charivari ou l'hypothèse de la monogamie. In: Le Charivari, ed. Le Goff, J. & Schmitt, J.-C., pp. 33–43. Mouton.Google Scholar
Lesourd, D. (1981) “Strigătorii”, une coutume de charivari roumaine? In: Le Charivari, ed. Le Goff, J. & Schmitt, J.-C., pp. 131–40. Mouton.Google Scholar
Manolescu, G. (1967/2004) Strigarea peste sat. [Calling over the village]. In: Mimă şi dramă în obiceiurile populare româneşti [Mimic and drama within Romanian folk customs] , ed. Turcuş, A.. Editura Excelsior Art.Google Scholar
Meisen, K. (1935/2001) La leggenda del cacciatore furioso e della caccia selvaggia [The legend of the wild hunter and of the wild hunt] , ed. Barillari, S. M.. Edizioni dell'Orso. (Original work published in 1935).Google Scholar
Neagota, B. (2012a) Făşanc – The carnival in the mountainside Banat: Historical-religious and ethnographical aspects. Revista de Etnografie şi Folclor/Journal of Ethnography and Folklore, New Series 12:147–68.Google Scholar
Neagota, B. (2012b) Căzătoare, necromante, vrăjitoare. Experiențe și tehnici arhaice ale extazului în regiunea Dunării de Mijloc [Căzătoare, necromancers, sorceresses. experiences and archaic techniques of ecstasy in the region of Middle Danube]. In: Orma. Revistă de studii etnologice şi istorico-religioase/Journal of Ethnological and Historical-Religious Studies, No. 17: Religiozitate şi ceremonialitate folklorică [Folk Religiosity and Ceremoniality], ed. Benga, I., pp. 51–98. Babes-Bolyai University, Department of Classical Languages and Literatures.Google Scholar