OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) has been associated with greater discounting of delayed rewards relative to healthy controls. The relationship, however, has been inconsistent, likely because previous studies had relatively small sample sizes and inadequately controlled for comorbid psychopathology and substance use. In the present study, we analyzed one of the largest clinical research samples to date to assess the influence of alcohol use on delay discounting, and examine the influence of confounding variables including substance use disorder. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In total, 801 participants completed a delay discounting task where they chose between smaller, immediately available monetary amounts ($0–$90) and $100 available after a delay of 7–30 days. Delay discounting behavior was summarized as the natural log of k, a constant derived from a hyperbolic discounting equation. Participants also completed Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV disorders, 90-day Timeline Followback interviews, and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Participants were divided into 4 groups: healthy controls (n=298), past AUD (n=69), and current AUD with (n=224) and without (n=210) comorbid psychopathology or substance use disorder. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine the effect of group on delay discounting. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There were significant differences in the distribution of delay discounting scores by group (H=80.195, p<0.001). Healthy controls and past AUD showed lower levels of delay discounting than current AUD and current AUD+comorbidity groups with medium effect sizes (Cohen’s d=−0.635 and Cohen’s d=−0.614, respectively). There were nearly no differences between current AUD with and without comorbid psychopathology groups (Cohen’s d=−0.024). The past AUD group showed almost no difference relative to the healthy control group (Cohen’s d=0.007). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Individuals with current AUD were shown to discount rewards greater than those without current AUD, although comorbid psychopathology did not significantly affect discounting. Surprisingly, individuals with past AUD were more similar to controls than to those with current AUD. Our findings suggest that current problematic alcohol use is related to greater discounting of delayed rewards, but comorbid diagnoses do not significantly impact this relationship. However, once problematic patterns of alcohol use cease, delay discounting appears to return to levels comparable to healthy controls.

ABSTRACT IMPACT: This work investigates C. difficile strains in soil as a potential exposure for gut colonization and community-acquired infection of C. difficile. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Identifying environmental sources of C. difficile can inform how non-hospital reservoirs can potentially contribute to C. difficile exposure and subsequent gastrointestinal colonization. The objective of the study was to identify C. difficile and toxin genes across various soil sources. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cross-sectional study utilizing soil samples obtained throughout Texas, USA. All samples were collected between August and November of 2019 and 2020. Samples were taken from human and animal high contact areas, such as recreational parks. Samples were stored at -80oC until processing. DNA extractions were performed using the DNeasy Powersoil Pro Kit (Qiagen) per manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was also performed on extracted DNA using the Microbial DNA qPCR Multi-Assay Kit for Clostridium difficile Pathogenicity (Qiagen) for the identification of C. difficile, toxin A (TcdA), and toxin B (TcdB) genes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 137 soil samples including dry dirt, sand, and wet soil near water sources were collected and processed for the presence of C. difficile. These included samples from parks and trails (42.3%), water sources (36.5%), and other public spaces (21.2%). C. difficile was identified in 59 (43.1%) soil samples: 6 (4.4%) with Toxin A and 2 (1.5%) with toxin B production. C. difficile was most prevalent among samples taken from parks and trails (50.0%), followed by other public spaces (48.3%), and water sources (32.0%). The median (IQR) Cq value for the C. difficile gene was 39.24 (33.45-40.47) among samples that tested positive. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: We identified a high prevalence of Clostridioides difficile in soil samples, though toxin gene detection prevalence was low. Future studies will analyze other sources, including water and varying surface samples to obtain a comprehensive view of C. difficile in the environment.

Composite endpoints can encode multiple pieces of information and are increasingly adopted in clinical trials. Advocacy for using composite endpoints began decades ago in cardiovascular trials, leading to incorporation of patient-oriented outcomes and consideration of a hierarchical ranking system. The use of composite endpoints in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) trials has evolved similarly. We conducted a literature review to investigate the use of composite endpoints in acute heart failure and COVID-19 clinical trials. The results showed more frequent use of patient-oriented outcomes and ordinal composite endpoints in COVID-19 trials, which might be driven by global consensus on a set of common outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: As pediatric care becomes more concentrated in large urban hospitals, smaller rural hospitals with reduced pediatric care capacity may opt to transfer pediatric patients to higher levels of care even if the patient has a condition that is manageable in a general ED. Up to 20-40% of pediatric transfers are considered avoidable, placing a burden on the patient, their family and the health care system. The aim of this study is to determine the association between pediatric readiness (as measured by the National Pediatric Readiness Project score) and risk of interfacility transfer. We hypothesized that emergency departments with higher measures of pediatric readiness would be less likely to transfer pediatric patients to another facility. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The most recent and complete National Pediatric Readiness Project data were from 300 California hospitals in 2012. These data include the overall pediatric readiness score, presence of inter-facility guidelines (written protocols on patients needing care not available at the hospital), presence of interfacility agreements (written agreements with other hospitals regarding transfer patients), and other variables on the facility’s capacity to care for pediatric patients. We linked these hospital data with patient encounter data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Emergency Department (ED) Database (OSHPD) using hospital name and zip code. To be eligible for the study, the patient must have a documented ED encounter and be less than 18 years old during the encounter. A patient was considered a transfer patient if they were transferred to a separate general hospital, children’s hospital, federal health care facility, rehabilitation facility, Critical Access Hospital or psychiatric hospital. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used for descriptive statistics. For non-normal data, we used the non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test. We also used logistic regression to compare the odds of transfer between comparison groups. Statistical analyses were conducted in the R environment version 3.4.4. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2012, there were 2,604,723 pediatric ED encounters, of which 10,966 resulted in a transfer (0.4%). Transferred patients on average were older (15 vs. 5 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (58.6% vs 46.6%, p < 0.001). The transfer group originated from hospitals with a lower median pediatric readiness score (76.0 vs 78.3, p < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be transferred if they were seen at a hospital with written guidelines with transfer protocols (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83—0.95, p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to be transferred if they were seen at a hospital with written interfacility agreements with other hospitals (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.10—1.25, p < 0.001). We anticipate, that even with more sophisticated multilevel statistical models, pediatric readiness scores will remain associated with odds of transfer. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These preliminary data suggest that hospitals with higher levels of pediatric readiness and written guidelines with transfer protocols are less likely to transfer pediatric patients. There may be actionable policy and procedural items that a hospital could enact to lower the rate of transfer patients. Future analyses will include more complex statistical modeling to adjust for confounders, will include inpatient data, and will compare the risk of potentially avoidable transfers between hospitals with varying levels of pediatric readiness.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Stress is amplified in parents of children with Down syndrome (DS). However, little is known about caregivers’use of coping strategies in relation to stress-related eating and their child with DS. The purpose of this study is to explore stressors and coping resources that increase or decrease stress-related eating among caregivers of children with DS. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This descriptive qualitative study sought to understand and describe the lived experiences of caregivers of children with DS. Fifteen caregivers of children, ages 2-6-years with DS, completed an online survey and individual interview. The Transactional Model of Stress and Coping was used to develop the interview guide and to assess related constructs using the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Salzburg Stress Eating Scale (SSES), and a subscale of the Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress Questionnaire (EADES). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo 12, and analyzed using deductive thematic analysis based on theoretical constructs and content analysis approaches. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Thirteen of the 15 participants reported moderate to high perceived stress on the PSS. Stressors identified by caregivers included caring for a child with DS, feeding difficulties, physical and mental health, family and social interactions, and finances. Caregivers utilized various interpersonal resources to cope, including family, friends, and social media groups. In the interviews, stress-related eating was revealed as a coping mechanism for 9 caregivers. Also, 13 caregivers reported eating more or eating less when stressed on the SSES and 7 caregivers reported increased emotional eating as measured on the sub-scale of the MEQ. Only two caregivers described using mindfulness strategies throughout the interview. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, caregivers of children with DS report increased perceived stress related to their role as a caregiver of a child with DS, which may be related to changes in caregivers’dietary intake. Dietary interventions developed for these families should include mindful eating and stress management strategies.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study aims to understand the potential immunomudualtory effect of APOL1 variants in auto-antigen activated myeloid cells by assessing lysosomal integrity in activated cells expressing APOL1. The primary stimuli were: 1. ssRNA hY3 as a proxy for the Ro immune complex; 2. in an bulk RNA seq model, interferon-response gene, Siglec 1, as a read out of interferon activity. The primary outcomes were: 1. Myeloid cell APOL1 expression both in primary macrophage cultures and ex-vivo patient derived macrophages; 2. Lysosome integrity as measured by fluorescence intensity of lysotracker dye on light microscopy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: All recruited subjects provided written informed consent as per the NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Division of Rheumatology-wide Specimen and Matched Phenotype Linked Examination (SAMPLE) protocol. Subjects were African American; SLE subjects met 4 American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE. Healthy donor monocytes representing each genotype in duplicate (reference allele: G0/G0; heterozygote variant: RV/G0; and homozygote variant RV/RV) were cultured with GM-CSF to yield macrophages which were incubated in serum free media or with hY3 ssRNA (TLR 7/8 agonist) to yield inflammatory M1 macrophages. Fold increase of APOL1 in untreated vs hY3 treated macrophages was measured using qPCR. Live cells were then cultured on glass chamber slides with DNA dye, DAPI, and Lysotracker red, a fluorescent dye that stains acidic lysosomes. As a proof of concept, interferon response gene, Signlec1, and APOL1 transcriptional activity in peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) were measured and correlated in 17 SLE patients by RNA seq. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Regardless of genotype, hY3 increased APOL1 expression by 29 (+/−18.4) fold (P = 0.007 vs no treatment). Genotyping of the qPCR product showed concordance with the chromosomal DNA with the RV heterozygotes expressing both alleles. To examine lysosomal membrane integrity, live hY3-treated macrophages were stained with lysosotracker dye and fluorescence intensity was measured. Compared to reference allele carrying macrophages, each additional variant allele corresponded with a lesser degree of lysosome compartment staining. In SLE PBMCs, we found that APOL1 was highly expressed, and significantly correlated with Siglec1 (F=10.5; P = 0.005) supporting an association between circulating interferons and APOL1 accumulation in monocytes. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Given that the “cytokine milieu” in SLE elicits APOL1 expression, induces inflammatory cell metabolic rewiring, and stimulates autophagy thereby exposing defects in autophagic flux, this gene-environment interaction may underpin the relationship between chronic inflammation and heightened APOL1 polymorphism-attributed cardiovascular risk. These data support further inquiry into the intersection between chronic autoimmunity and APOL1’s functional role in the vascular microenvironment. The in vitro studies herein extend our prior work by demonstrating a mechanistic link between SLE-associated inflammation, APOL1 risk variant status and CVD via a lysosomal defect which converges on common autophagic and metabolic pathways in mononuclear cells.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Purpose - The goal of this study is to understand how loss of the membrane protein SLC4A11 alters endothelial cell metabolism thereby producing Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy. Studies from our lab indicated that glutamine-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the outcomes of SLC4a11 loss. In the current study, we ask if autophagy and mitophagy pathways and the signaling pathways that regulate these processes are altered in SLC4a11 KO cells. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods – Immortalized mouse WT and SLC4a11 KO cell lines were incubated in DMEM with and without 0.5mM glutamine for 6 hours. In order to assess mitophagy, cells were stained using Lysotracker Red and Mitotracker Green. Colocalization co-efficients of red and green channels were obtained for at least 35 cells using Zeiss-Zen Pro software. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance. For Western Blots, antibodies against LC3b, AMPK, pAMPK, and b-actin were used to examine autophagy flux and potential signaling pathways that regulate autophagy. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results – In the presence of glutamine, the colocalization co-efficient of Lysotracker Red and Mitotracker Green channels was significantly increased in KO cells (0.74 ±0.18) relative to WT (0.58±0.20) with a p-value ≤0.0024. In the absence of glutamine, the colocalization co-efficient was reversed, for KO cells 0.54 ±0.14 and for WT cells 0.77±0.0.16 with a p-value ≤0.0001, suggesting increased mitophagy by glutamine in KO cells. Western Blots indicated that glutamine increased autophagy flux, as indicated by increased levels of LC3b following bafilomycin A treatment in KO cells. Concomitantly, there was an increase in pAMPK/AMPK levels suggesting a potential mechanism for increased mitophagy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Conclusion and Future studies –Our data indicates enhanced mitophagy as well as autophagy in SLC4a11 KO cells. Future studies will determine whether these processes regulate cell survival in mouse models of corneal endothelial dystrophies.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Research overview: Providing patient-centered care is increasingly a top priority in the U.S. healthcare system.1,2 Hospitals are required to publicly report patient-centered assessments, including results from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction surveys.3 Furthermore, clinician and hospital reimbursements are partially determined by performance on patient satisfaction measures.3 Consequently, hospitals and clinicians may be incentivized to improve patient satisfaction scores over other important outcomes.4 Paradoxically then, the pursuit of patient-centered care may lead clinicians to fulfill patient requests for unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments.5 Opioid prescribing during hospitalizations may be particularly affected by clinicians’ seeking to optimize patient satisfaction scores.6,7 Satisfaction with pain care is an important predictor of overall patient satisfaction in the HCAHPS surveys,8,9 and clinicians report increased pressure to fulfill patient requests for immediate pain-relief.10,11 Therefore, clinicians may prescribe opioids to avoid receiving lower patient satisfaction scores.12,13 Furthermore, clinicians lack clear guidance on opioid prescribing for some populations, including non-surgical inpatients, who represent almost half of all hospitalizations.14 To reduce clinicians’ incentive to prescribe opioids as a means of achieving patient satisfaction, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) temporarily removed questions related to patient satisfaction with pain care from the clinician and hospital reimbursement formulas beginning in 2018.15 Importantly, prior research16-20 has not rigorously tested the hypothesis implied by the CMS policy change: that certain opioid prescribing practices in inpatient pain care are associated with higher patient satisfaction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the receipt/dose of opioids during non-surgical hospitalizations and patient satisfaction measured by the HCAHPS survey. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods/Study Population: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional study of adults (18 and older) with non-surgical hospitalizations within the 11-hospital healthcare system in a Midwestern state from 2011-2016. Data were extracted from electronic health records and linked to HCAHPS patient satisfaction surveys. We estimated the propensity score for receipt of any opioids during hospitalization and separately the receipt of high dose opioids (≥100 morphine milligram equivalent [MME]) based on patient, encounter, and facility characteristics for all hospitalizations with complete data. We used nearest neighbor matching to construct two matched samples to minimize selection bias and confounding by indication. We used a standardized difference threshold of < 0.1 as an indication of the balance between matched groups. Outcomes were compared with a test on the equality of proportions using large-sample statistics. All analysis was performed in STATA 14.0 analytical software. Main outcomes: We analyzed four dependent variables. Two pain-specific patient satisfaction variables were derived from the responses to the following survey questions: 1) “During this hospital stay, how often your pain was well controlled? (pain control)” and 2) “During this hospital stay, how often did the hospital staff do everything they could to help you with your pain? (pain help)”, with 4-point Likert scale responses ranging from “Never” to “Always.” We also used two global satisfaction measures derived from the responses to the following survey questions: 1) “Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is the worst hospital possible and 10 is the best hospital possible, what number would you use to rate this hospital during your stay (overall patient satisfaction)?” and 2) “Would you recommend this hospital to your friends and family (willingness to recommend a hospital)? (4-point scale of “Definitely Yes” to “Definitely No”). Because the responses are not normally distributed, and the response options are truncated, we dichotomized each of these questions following previously published approaches8 and CMS methodology3 (e.g. “always” vs. all other responses or “9 or 10 rating” vs. all others). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results: Among 17,691 patients who reported that they needed pain medications during hospitalization in their HCAHPS survey, 43.7% (n=7,735) received opioids. Among the matched sample (n=8,848), 55% were female, 90% were white, 9% were black, 74% were emergency admissions, 29% had a circulatory diagnosis, 92% were discharged home, and the average pain score ranged from 0.2 to 7.1 during the hospital stay. Compared to matched patients hospitalized but did not receiving opioids, those who received opioids did not significantly differ in their rating of pain help (75% of patients without opioids rated that they always received help for their pain versus 75% of patients with opioids; p=.78), pain control (55% of patients without opioids reported that their pain was well controlled versus 54% on opioids; p=.93), willingness to recommend the hospital (69% of patients without opioids reported that they would definitely recommend a hospital versus 71% with opioids; p=.16) and overall rating of their care (47% of patients without opioids rated their hospitalization as 10 versus 46% on opioids; p=.22). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Discussion: We found no evidence that receipt of opioids is associated with patient satisfaction, including at doses. To our knowledge, this is the first study that used propensity score matching to examine the association between inpatient opioid prescribing practices and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, our sample is unique in the inclusion of patients hospitalized for non-surgical indicators over a five year period in the multi-hospital healthcare system in a Midwestern state. Our findings add to the existing literature which has shown contradictory associations between opioid prescribing and patient satisfaction.16-22 Specifically, few studies that looked at surgical inpatients showed a lack of association between patient satisfaction16,18 and opioid prescribing, whereas others showed that receipt of opioids was associated with lower patient satisfaction.17-20 Our findings may imply that satisfaction with pain care may be achieved without administering opioids to non-surgical inpatients. Alternatively, satisfaction with pain care may not be influenced by opioid prescribing for non-surgical inpatients. Future research should further examine the association between opioid prescribing and patient satisfaction among non-surgical inpatients on a national scale to get a better understanding of the relationship between certain pain care practices and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To mobilize and engage CHWs/promotores as stakeholders, we aim to promote the capacity for CHWs participate in patient centered research (PCOR) by locally implementing a structured research training curriculum for CHWs. Main Questions: How the process of mobilization and engagement would be implemented at local/state level? What would be project challenges, risks and barriers at each and across sites? What modifications would be made to the initial PCOR for CHWs training curriculum and toolkit based on local feedback from collaborators, in both English and Spanish? What would be lessons learned on mobilization, engagement of, and sustainability for CHW training organizations as partners in PCOR? METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Measures: Monthly calls and quarterly reports from local organizations on activities, deliverables status, modifications, project implementation challenges/barriers and solutions (experienced and potential) to achieve goals of training 10 PCOR CHW Champions and a total of 360 CHWs/promotores trained in PCOR. Input from Note taker reports, Feedback and Evaluation Forms from training attendees at each session. Co-authorship of team members on dissemination activities (submissions for presentations, posters, blogs entries, webinars). Activities/Procedures: Via a highly participatory, consensus-driven decision-making approach, each of the organizations in the target states provide input into refining the toolkit for local use, select the training champions and develop CHW/promotor outreach and recruitment plans, and deliver the PCOR training to CHWs. In addition, the organizations will also set up a local stakeholder CHW/promotores advisory group. Environmental scan and literature review continues on training content areas to complement field experience in implementing the trainings at local sites. Project information tools developed (info sheet for local organizations, informational slide set to be used at calls and statewide seminars, a templates for flyer for training recruitment, agenda, certificates). FL and TN pilot of the translation of the curriculum, addressing problematic concepts and terms, collecting feedback forms eliciting input on terminology variations across Spanish speaking populations and literacy levels. Project Collaborators: Día de la Mujer Latina, a patient advocacy group in Texas with CHW trainings in several states and Puerto Rico Chula Vista Community Collaborative, a community health empowerment organization in Southern California Progresso Community Center, a Latino-focused health coalition based in Tennessee Florida Community Health Worker Coalition, a statewide partnership dedicated to the support and promotion of the CHW profession in Florida. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results: Trainings per State - Y1 Jan- October 2018 Totals: 11 PCOR Champions and 252 PCOR-Trained CHWs in CA-TX-TN Y2 Plans (October 2018-September 2019): Will continue to collect CHW trainee demographic data, CHW certification and patient/patient advocate status. Will conduct qualitative and quantitative analysis of all quarterly reports, Note taker, and trainee Feedback and Evaluation forms. Will reach goal of 360 PCOR-trained CHWs in FL, CA, TX and TN. Will continue to submit abstracts on our story on building patient and stakeholder capacity to participate as partners in patient-centered outcomes research, engagement and mobilization, from topic generation through the dissemination of research results. From evaluation analysis of content and process measures, we will discuss sustainability strategies as shared learning collaborative. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Challenges/Decision Points Y1: On Mobilization and Engagement: Across partners, different levels of readiness/capacities/structures, and access to local resources Process application for request for content and guest instructor approvals to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) for CHW and CHW Instructor credit Co-branding of informational products (recruitment flyers, agendas, certificates), slides of Welcome section On Content and Curriculum Development: Address different levels of literacy Format (1-day vs spread, in person/online, prescriptive vs open) Clear distinction between service provision and research; paradigm shift of transfer of skills Inserting examples of unethical health research past activities with both African American and Hispanic/Latino populations Reinstating phases of clinical studies basic information Creating a study research design activity in Chapter 1 CHW role as member of research team Adding PCORI-funded project summary fact sheet per state On translations: Diversity of nuances of meaning in vocabulary for concepts On sustainability: Different degrees of organizational and personal involvement Next for newly PCOR-trained CHWs Meaningfully engaging patients and other stakeholders is increasingly recognized as requisite to generate research findings that are trusted, meaningful, and useful to clinicians, patients, and their families. One key engagement strategy used for engaging specific patients/caregivers and patient advocates in underserved communities is leveraging our partnerships with Community Health Workers (CHWs). Moreover, there is a documented need for higher level of training skills to undertake activities such as community health assessments, program evaluations and clinical studies. University of Miami (UM) along FL partners has successfully developed a 7-hr specialized toolkit on patient-centered research for CHWs and trained 148 CHWs/promotores (original plans were for 100) across the six major statewide regions. Evaluation data resulted in 100% of attendees responses’ as excellent and 99% would recommend it to others. Qualitative comments included “even though the training was tailored for research, I feel that it applies to many other aspects of the CHW role” and “I feel more empowered in my role after hearing explicitly the opportunities…for a CHW to be more involved in the research process”. UM has partnered with stakeholders in FL, Texas, southern California and Tennessee to develop a Spanish version of the PCOR for CHWs Training Toolkit (including a slide deck, Facilitator’s Guide and Student Workbook) that can be culturally and linguistically appropriate, to train local CHWs/promotores as PCOR CHW Champions. Attendees will receive lunch and a certificate of participation upon completion of the module. In turn, they agree to train local CHWs in their region. These 7 credit hrs could be used as credits towards state certification requirements, in states with CHW certification programs. This partnership for the mobilization and engagement of CHWs/promotores aims to strengthen their capacity to be involved in PCOR at the local and national level and increase the organizational capacity of CHW representative organizations in their promotion of PCOR. This type of research aims to help patients and those who care for them make better-informed decisions about the healthcare choices they face every day, guided by those who will use that information. In doing so, CHWs/promotores are contributing to PCOR in addressing health disparities and achieving health equity as a more culturally and linguistically diverse healthcare workforce and PCOR research team members.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Limited specialty care within safety net health systems reduces availability of follow-up appointments for chronic conditions. We evaluated patient acceptability of a 6 month series of telemedicine group medical visits for chronic migraine at a county hospital-based clinic as a potential method to improve access to specialty care in this setting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We developed and implemented a pilot program of monthly physician-led telemedicine group visits to provide routine follow-up care for adults with chronic migraine. Visits were conducted through the neurology clinic at LAC+USC medical center, a safety net hospital in Los Angeles and included an educational component, peer support, and the opportunity to address individual needs or refill medications. We assessed headache severity (HIT-6) and mood (PHQ-9) through telephone surveys before and 6 months after patients’ first telemedicine group visit and compared timepoints using paired t-tests. Patient acceptability of the group visits was elicited through focus groups and key themes identified using grounded field theory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Baseline data was available for 18/20 pilot participants. Patients were predominantly female (89%) with mean age of 46 (SD 8.6). Mean HIT-6 was 65/78 reflecting a very severe impact on daily life, and mean PHQ-9 was 8.7 reflecting mild depressive symptoms. There was no statistically significant change in either HIT-6 (mean difference 2.36, p=0.34) or PHQ-9 (mean difference 2.09, p=0.12) after group participation. Key themes from the focus groups included lack of prior exposure to other people with similar headache burden and logistical barriers to care, such as difficulty contacting a provider or extended clinic wait times. Primary patient-reported benefits included more frequent access to a provider and peer support. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Telemedicine group visits for chronic migraine are feasible in a safety net context and were well-received by patients. However, this pilot study did not show a benefit of telemedicine group visits for headache control or mood symptoms.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Colorado Community Engagement Alliance Against COVID-19 Disparities (CO-CEAL) Team has worked with 5 racial/ethnic communities in Colorado to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and develop messages, materials and dissemination strategies to impact vaccine hesitancy. Relationships have been key facilitators of this work. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: CO-CEAL was funded for one year as a part of the national CEAL Teams effort. CO-CEAL engaged urban Hispanic/LatinX, rural Hispanic/LatinX, urban African/American, rural African Immigrant and urban American Indian/Alaska Native communities through Community Connectors in each community. Our Community Connectors led recruitment of community members for our community survey data collection (goal of 200 surveys from each community) and participation in our 5 Community (Boot Camp) Translations. Where possible we worked with Community Connectors and leveraged community relationships with whom we had worked over multiple years and projects. In two communities we worked to quickly build and establish new relationships with Community Connectors and their communities. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The rapid nature of the CO-CEAL project, its timeline and the unusual nature of the funding mechanism required adaptations to usual ways of working on both the academic and community side.In our CO-CEAL partner communities where there was a history of working together, concerns, possible barriers and other issues tended to be rapidly addressed. The prior existing, long-standing relationships fostered trust that enabled open airing of concerns and an ability to address issues as they arose. In CO-CEAL partner communities where new relationships were being forged, trust needed to be build from the ground up. This made adaptations more challenging and the ability to address concerns and issues as they arose more problematic. Although the work has moved forward in all communities, extra care has been required in some. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: When crises necessitate rapid action in communities, the depth of prior investments in building and maintaining relationships makes a difference in how rapidly and successfully partners can work together to address a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. Funders and Academic researchers should invest broadly in communities to enable rapid responses.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Use an easily accessible medium to educate life science researchers and academic innovators interested in the commercialization of academic research at the University of Michigan (UM). METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Life science research investigators and academic innovators interested in research commercialization and technology development from across the state of Michigan were invited to attend the Idea to Impact: The Translation & Commercialization of Academic Research webinar series, presented by Fast Forward Medical Innovation at the University of Michigan. The webinar series outlined the significance and critical milestones of developing novel therapeutics, medical devices, diagnostics, and digital health innovations, as well as essential collaborations with industry partners to translate a research-based idea into a product of impact. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 113 investigators and innovators from 28 different institutions, organizations, and companies, registered for the webinar series. Results (N=24) of an evaluation immediately following each webinar revealed that 100% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that the series was effective in helping them to identify and describe commercialization resources, including funding, education, and mentorship, available at the University of Michigan and within the state. Participants stated that they “loved the practical information” “shared” and that the series was a “great overview that inspired a lot more questions.” The Fast Forward Medical Innovation team was then able to consult with participants to connect them with additional resources. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The data suggests that easily accessible and digestible commercialization education can make navigating the academic entrepreneurial ecosystem easier for investigators and innovators. The recorded webinar series, Idea to Impact: The Translation & Commercialization of Academic Research, serves this purpose.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We are launching a multi-center prospective registry for patients with metastatic invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common type of breast cancer, to better understand patterns of progression, imaging features of metastatic sites, and if serial cell free DNA measurements can serve as a surrogate marker of disease progression. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Patients with biopsy proven metastatic ILC of any receptor subtype will be included in the registry. We will exclude patients with ductal histology only or those with multiple primary malignancies. Patients will be enrolled at four large academic medical centers across the country. Cell free DNA measurements using a tumor informed assay will be obtained every 3 months concurrent with regular clinical imaging. Disease status will be determined by the patient’s medical oncologist by taking into account imaging, tumor markers, symptoms, and cell free DNA measurement. At each time point, patients will be surveyed on their quality of life and their medical oncologists will be asked to rate the clinical utility of the cell free DNA value. Patients will be followed indefinitely. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We will explore whether the use of serial cell free DNA or a combination of blood-based biomarkers and clinical endpoints can reliably identify treatment response and disease progression in patients with metastatic ILC. Many patients with metastatic ILC have unmeasurable disease on imaging and are thereby excluded from clinical trials. The end goal of this registry is to determine if blood-based biomarkers can be used as a proxy for measurable disease in ILC patients and therefore increase clinical trial enrollment for this subgroup of patients. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The creation of this prospective registry will open the door for future studies of blood-based markers that reflect disease stability and progression, which is an unmet need specifically in ILC. Identification of such markers could lead to a novel treatment response endpoint, changing the way patients are enrolled in trials and managed clinically.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Thiswork is an evidential study that demonstrates the positive impactof integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) and SocialDeterminants of Health on an important health outcome, notably in decreasing the 30-day unplanned hospital ED readmissions at Sinai Health Systems. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using datafrom the Sinai Urban Health Institute (SUHI), we compare predictingthe readmissions of patients with and without data pertainingto Social Determinants of Health (SDoH). We thoroughly describe the data cleaning and data pre-processing, done in collaboration with experts in community health. We use a fundamental and ubiquitous classifier in Random Forest for its feature characterization capability in order to translate models results into insights and recommendations for the CHW program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We show that when patients are simply engaged byCHWs, regardless of the content of those conversations, we canincrease the predictive accuracy of our classifier by 5%. We usethis result to make recommendations for improving patient careand discuss limitations and future work. Importantly our workpoints directly to the human connection between patients andCHWs as an important feature in the readmission rate. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our work shows that the predictive capabilities of the classifier increases with CHW logs and SDoH survey data, highlighting the benefit of collecting this information. This is the first step in early identification of such patients so that CHWs are focusing on and providing resources to patients who will most benefit from the program.

The Stanford Population Health Sciences Data Ecosystem was created to facilitate the use of large datasets containing health records from hundreds of millions of individuals. This necessitated technical solutions optimized for an academic medical center to manage and share high-risk data at scale. Through collaboration with internal and external partners, we have built a Data Ecosystem to host, curate, and share data with hundreds of users in a secure and compliant manner. This platform has enabled us to host unique data assets and serve the needs of researchers across Stanford University, and the technology and approach were designed to be replicable and portable to other institutions. We have found, however, that though these technological advances are necessary, they are not sufficient. Challenges around making data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable remain. Our experience has demonstrated that there is a high demand for access to real-world data, and that if the appropriate tools and structures are in place, translational research can be advanced considerably. Together, technological solutions, management structures, and education to support researcher, data science, and community collaborations offer more impactful processes over the long-term for supporting translational research with real-world data.