Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:45:06.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social groups and the computational conundrums of delays, proximity, and loyalty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Dragos Simandan Open the ORCID record for Dragos Simandan [Opens in a new window]
Dragos Simandan*
Affiliation:
Geography Department, Brock University, St. Catharines, ONL2S 3A1, Canada simandan@brocku.cahttps://brocku.ca/social-sciences/geography/faculty-and-staff/dragos-simandan/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though Pietraszewski acknowledges the tentative nature of the theory and the multiple lines of adjacent research needed to flesh it out, he insists that the finite set of primitives he identified is necessary and sufficient for defining social groups in the context of conflict. In this commentary I expose three interrelated conundrums that cast doubt on this simplistic presumption.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e121
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malpas, J. (2012). Putting space in place: Philosophical topography and relational geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenquist, A. (1982). Loyalties. The Journal of Philosophy, 79(4), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2016). Proximity, subjectivity, and space: Rethinking distance in human geography. Geoforum, 75, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2018). Competition, contingency, and destabilization in urban assemblages and actor-networks. Urban Geography, 39(5), 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2019a). Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2019b). Competition, delays, and coevolution in markets and politics. Geoforum, 98, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2019c). Iterative lagged asymmetric responses in strategic management and long-range planning. Time & Society, 28(4), 1363–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simandan, D. (2020). Being surprised and surprising ourselves: A geography of personal and social change. Progress in Human Geography, 44(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed