Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:53:26.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can group representations based on relational cues warrant the rich inferences typically drawn from group membership?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Katalin Oláh Open the ORCID record for Katalin Oláh [Opens in a new window]  and
Ildikó Király
Katalin Oláh
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1046 Budapest, Hungary olah.katalin@ppk.elte.hu kiraly.ildiko@ppk.elte.hu MTA-ELTE Social Minds Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1046 Budapest, Hungary
Ildikó Király
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1046 Budapest, Hungary olah.katalin@ppk.elte.hu kiraly.ildiko@ppk.elte.hu MTA-ELTE Social Minds Research Group, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1046 Budapest, Hungary Cognitive Development Centre, Central European University, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pietraszewski's model – though promising in many respects – needs to be extended so that it can explain the multitude of rich inferences that people draw from group membership. In this commentary, we highlight some facets of group thinking, especially from the field of developmental psychology, that cannot be unambiguously accounted for by a model that is built solely on relational cues.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e114
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Liberman, Z., Gerdin, E., Kinzler, K. D., & Shaw, A. (2020). (Un)common knowledge: Children use social relationships to determine who knows what. Developmental Science, 23(6), e12962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L., & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). The origins of social categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 556–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, M., & Chalik, L. (2013). Social categories as markers of intrinsic interpersonal obligations. Psychological Science, 24(6), 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shutts, K., Kinzler, K. D., McKee, C. B., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Social information guides infants’ selection of foods. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(1–2), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soley, G. (2019). What do group members share? The privileged status of cultural knowledge for children. Cognitive Science, 43(10), e12786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar