Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:39:36.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using laboratory intergroup conflict and riots as a “stress test”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

James M. Allen  and
Daniel C. Richardson Open the ORCID record for Daniel C. Richardson [Opens in a new window]
James M. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Psyhology, University College London (UCL), London WC1H 0AP, UK jmallen@cantab.net daniel.richardson@ucl.ac.ukhttps://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/experimental-psychology/person/daniel-richardson/
Daniel C. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Psyhology, University College London (UCL), London WC1H 0AP, UK jmallen@cantab.net daniel.richardson@ucl.ac.ukhttps://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/experimental-psychology/person/daniel-richardson/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We apply the author's computational approach to groups to our empirical work studying and modelling riots. We suggest that assigning roles in particular gives insight, and measuring the frequency of bystander behaviour provides a method to understand the dynamic nature of intergroup conflict, allowing social identity to be incorporated into models of riots.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e98
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baudains, P., Braithwaite, A., & Johnson, S. D. (2013a). Target choice during extreme events: A discrete spatial choice model of the 2011 London riots. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 51, 251–285.Google Scholar
Baudains, P., Johnson, S. D., & Braithwaite, A. M. (2013b). Geographic patterns of diffusion in the 2011 London riots. Applied Geography, 45, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnasse-Gahot, L., Berestycki, H., Depuiset, M.-A., Gordon, M. B., Roché, S., Rodriguez, N., & Nadal, J.-P. (2018). Epidemiological modelling of the 2005 French riots: A spreading wave and the role of contagion. Scientific Reports, 8, 107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18093-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, T. P., Fry, H. M., Wilson, A. G., & Bishop, S. R. (2013). A mathematical model of the London riots and their policing. Scientific Reports, 3, 1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dezecache, G., Allen, J. M., von Zimmerman, J., & Richardson, D. C. (2021). We predict a riot: Inequity, relative deprivation and collective destruction in the laboratory. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288, 20203091. doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.3091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Stott, C., Ball, R., Reicher, S., Neville, F., Bell, L., & Ryan, C. (2020). A social identity model of riot diffusion: From injustice to empowerment in the 2011 London riots. European Journal of Social Psychology. n/a. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420140102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, C., Ball, R., Drury, J., Neville, F., Reicher, S., Boardman, A., & Choudhury, S. (2018). The evolving normative dimensions of “riot”: Towards an elaborated social identity explanation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 834–849. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, C., & Drury, J. (2017). Contemporary understanding of riots: Classical crowd psychology, ideology and the social identity approach. Public Understanding of Science, 26, 2–14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516639872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed