We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Antipsychotics effective for schizophrenia approved prior to 2024 shared the common mechanism of postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptor antagonism or partial agonism. Positive psychosis symptoms correlate with excessive presynaptic dopamine turnover and release, yet this postsynaptic mechanism improved positive symptoms only in some patients, and with concomitant risk for off-target motor and endocrine adverse effects; moreover, these agents showed no benefit for negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. The sole exception was data supporting cariprazine’s superiority to risperidone for negative symptoms. The muscarinic M1/M4 agonist xanomeline was approved in September 2024 and represents the first of a new antipsychotic class. This novel mechanism improves positive symptoms by reducing presynaptic dopamine release. Xanomeline also lacks any D2 receptor affinity and is not associated with motor or endocrine side effects. Of importance, xanomeline treated patients with higher baseline levels of cognitive dysfunction in clinical trials data saw cognitive improvement, a finding likely related to stimulation of muscarinic M1 receptors. Treatment resistance is seen in one-third of schizophrenia patients. These individuals do not have dopamine dysfunction underlying their positive symptoms, and therefore show limited response to antipsychotics that target dopamine neurotransmission. Clozapine remains the only medication with proven efficacy for resistant schizophrenia, and with unique benefits for persistent impulsive aggression and suicidality. New molecules are being studied to address the array of positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia; however, until their approval, clinicians must be familiar with currently available agents and be adept at prescribing clozapine.
No drugs are currently approved for the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). These studies (a randomised study and its open-label extension) aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole for the treatment of BPD.
Methods:
The Phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled adult outpatients with BPD. After a 1-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised 1:1 to brexpiprazole 2–3 mg/day (flexible dose) or placebo for 11 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Zanarini Rating Scale for BPD total score from randomisation (Week 1) to Week 10 (timing of randomisation and endpoint blinded to investigators and patients). The Phase 2/3, multicentre, open-label extension study enrolled patients who completed the randomised study; all patients received brexpiprazole 2–3 mg/day (flexible dose) for 12 weeks. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Results:
Brexpiprazole was not statistically significantly different from placebo on the primary endpoint of the randomised study (N = 324 randomised; N = 110 analysed per treatment group; least squares mean difference −1.02; 95% confidence limits −2.75, 0.70; p = 0.24). Numerical efficacy advantages for brexpiprazole were observed at other time points. The most common TEAE in the randomised study was akathisia (brexpiprazole, 14.0%; placebo, 1.2%); data from the open-label study (N = 199 analysed) suggested that TEAEs were transient.
Conclusion:
The primary endpoint of the randomised study was not met. Further research on brexpiprazole in BPD is warranted based on possible efficacy signals at other time points and its safety profile.
Quality of life is decreased in bipolar disorders (BD) and contributes to poor prognosis. However, little is known about the causal pathways that may affect it. This study aimed to explore health-related QoL (HRQoL) in BD and investigate its relationship with cognition and psychosocial functioning.
Methods
This multicenter cross-sectional study used a neuropsychological battery to assess five cognition domains. Functioning was evaluated using global and domain-based tools, and health-related HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L. Structural equation modeling was used to test whether the association between cognition and HRQoL would be mediated by functioning in BD while controlling for covariates such as residual depression, anxiety, antipsychotic medication, and psychotic features.
Results
We included 1 190 adults with euthymic BD. The model provided a good fit for the data. In this model, the direct effect of cognition on HRQoL was not significant (β = − 0.03, z = −0.78, p = 0.433). The total effect of cognition on HRQoL was weak, albeit significant (β = 0.05, z = 3.6, p < 0.001), thus suggesting that cognition affected HRQoL only indirectly through functioning. Anxiety was associated with decreased functioning (β = −0.27, z = −7.4, p < 0.001) and QoL (β = −0.39, z = −11.8, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
These findings suggest that improving cognition may not directly lead to a higher HRQoL. Cognitive remediation is expected to improve HRQoL only through functioning enhancement. They also reveal the potential importance of functional remediation and reduction of comorbid anxiety symptoms in improving HRQoL in BD.
Bipolar disorder is a condition that is commonly encountered in the older adult population. Estimates are that up to 4.5% of adults in the US are affected by bipolar disorder. The estimates for older adults are between 0.5 and 1%. Starting a mood stabilizer or second-generation antipsychotic is a good first choice for those who are depressed with a known personal history of bipolar disorder and who are not already on one. It is important for healthcare providers in long-term care settings to recognize early signs of psychiatric destabilization in those with bipolar disorder. Signs of destabilization in older adults can be decreased need for sleep, increased irritability, a general increase in activity, or even the development of psychosis (delusions or hallucinations).
To compare time to relapse in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) stabilised on antidepressant treatment (ADT) + brexpiprazole who were randomised to continued adjunctive brexpiprazole or brexpiprazole withdrawal (switch to placebo).
Methods:
This Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, randomised withdrawal study enrolled adults with MDD and inadequate response to 2–3 ADTs. All patients started on adjunctive brexpiprazole 2–3 mg/day (Phase A, 6–8 weeks). Patients whose symptoms stabilised (Phase B, 12 weeks) were randomised 1:1 to adjunctive brexpiprazole or adjunctive placebo (Phase C, 26 weeks). The primary endpoint was time to relapse in Phase C. Depression rating scale score changes were secondary endpoints.
Results:
1149 patients were enrolled and 489 patients were randomised (ADT + brexpiprazole n = 240; ADT + placebo n = 249). Median time to relapse was 63 days from randomisation in both treatment groups for patients who received ≥1 dose. Relapse criteria were met by 22.5% of patients (54/240) on ADT + brexpiprazole and 20.6% (51/248) on ADT + placebo (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.67; p = 0.51, log-rank test). Depression scale scores improved during Phases A–B and were maintained in Phase C. Mean weight increased by 2.2 kg in Phases A–B and stabilised in Phase C.
Conclusion:
Time to relapse was similar between continued adjunctive brexpiprazole and brexpiprazole withdrawal; in both groups, ∼80% of stabilised patients remained relapse free at their last visit. Adjunctive brexpiprazole therapy was generally well tolerated over up to 46 weeks, with minimal adverse effects following brexpiprazole withdrawal.
There is growing concern regarding teratogenic effect of antipsychotics. Previous research assessing association between antipsychotics and congenital malformations (CMs) yielded mixed results and were all derived from Western countries. We aimed to examine risk of major and organ/system-specific CMs associated with prenatal antipsychotic exposure in Hong Kong.
Methods
This population-based study identified women aged 15–50 years who delivered their first/singleton child between 2003–2018 from public healthcare service database. Propensity score (PS)-weighted logistic-regression analyses were performed to examine risk of CMs following first-trimester exposure to antipsychotic classes (second- and first-generation antipsychotic; SGA and FGA) and six most frequently-prescribed individual antipsychotics.
Results
Of 465,069 women, 419 and 420 redeemed ≥1 prescription of SGA and FGA during first-trimester, respectively. Prevalence of any CMs was 4.9% (95%CI:4.9–5.0%) in unexposed-infants, 9.1% (6.7–12.3%) in SGA-exposed infants, and 6.2% (4.3–9.0%) in FGA-exposed infants. SGA exposure (adjusted-odds-ratio: 2.11 [95%CI:1.19–3.86]) was associated with increased risk of CMs. This finding was consistent with sensitivity analyses addressing exposure misclassification and confounding by treatment indication, but not with PS-matched sensitivity analysis. Elevated risk of CMs was observed in infants exposed to high-dose olanzapine (7.50 [1.65–36.13]) and high-dose quetiapine (15.03 [4.86–56.72]), but with wide-CIs. Organ/system-specific malformations were not associated with SGA, FGA or individual antipsychotics.
Conclusion
We observed a small increased risk of major malformations associated with SGA, but was not consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses, precluding firm conclusions. Research with large sample size clarifying comparative safety of individual antipsychotics on specific malformations is warranted.
The optimal duration of antipsychotic treatment following remission of first-episode psychosis (FEP) is uncertain, considering potential adverse effects and individual variability in relapse rates. This study aimed to investigate the effect of antipsychotic discontinuation compared to continuation on recovery in remitted FEP patients.
Methods
CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched on November 2, 2023, with no language restrictions. RCTs evaluating antipsychotic discontinuation in remitted FEP patients were selected. The primary outcome was personal recovery, and secondary outcomes included functional recovery, global functioning, hospital admission, symptom severity, quality of life, side effects, and employment. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE. Meta-analysis used a random-effect model with an inverse-variance approach.
Results
Among 2185 screened studies, 8 RCTs (560 participants) were included. No RCTs reported personal recovery as an outcome. Two studies measured functional recovery, and discontinuation group patients were more likely to achieve functional recovery (RR 2.19; 95% CIs: 1.13, 4.22; I2 = 0%; n = 128), although evidence certainty was very low. No significant differences were found in hospital admission, symptom severity, quality of life, global functioning, or employment between the discontinuation and continuation groups.
Conclusions
Personal recovery was not reported in any antipsychotic discontinuation trial in remitted FEP. The observed positive effect of discontinuation on functional recovery came from an early terminated trial and an RCT followed by an uncontrolled period. These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to very low certainty of evidence.
Individuals with schizophrenia exposed to second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) have an increased risk for diabetes, with aripiprazole purportedly a safer drug. Less is known about the drugs' mortality risk or whether serious mental illness (SMI) diagnosis or race/ethnicity modify these effects.
Methods
Authors created a retrospective cohort of non-elderly adults with SMI initiating monotherapy with an SGA (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, aripiprazole) or haloperidol during 2008–2013. Three-year diabetes incidence or all-cause death risk differences were estimated between each drug and aripiprazole, the comparator, as well as effects within SMI diagnosis and race/ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses evaluated potential confounding by indication.
Results
38 762 adults, 65% White and 55% with schizophrenia, initiated monotherapy, with haloperidol least (6%) and quetiapine most (26·5%) frequent. Three-year mortality was 5% and diabetes incidence 9.3%. Compared with aripiprazole, haloperidol and olanzapine reduced diabetes risk by 1.9 (95% CI 1.2–2.6) percentage points, or a 18.6 percentage point reduction relative to aripiprazole users' unadjusted risk (10.2%), with risperidone having a smaller advantage. Relative to aripiprazole users' unadjusted risk (3.4%), all antipsychotics increased mortality risk by 1.1–2.2 percentage points, representing 32.4–64.7 percentage point increases. Findings within diagnosis and race/ethnicity were generally consistent with overall findings. Only quetiapine's higher mortality risk held in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions
Haloperidol's, olanzapine's, and risperidone's lower diabetes risks relative to aripiprazole were not robust in sensitivity analyses but quetiapine's higher mortality risk proved robust. Findings expand the evidence on antipsychotics' risks, suggesting a need for caution in the use of quetiapine among individuals with SMI.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a short-acting antipsychotic (acepromazine) on the stress response to transport in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Twenty-one roe deer were submitted to a nine-hour road journey in order to reintroduce and restock this species into Catalonia (north-eastern Spain). The animals were divided into two groups: animals in the treatment group received an intramuscular injection of acepromazine (0.13 mg kg−1 in 0.5 ml; n = 9) while animals in the control group received the same volume of saline (n = 12). Clinical (heart rate and body temperature, measured during transport using remote devices), haematological, and biochemical indicators of stress were used to evaluate the effect of the antipsychotic. Heart rate increased during transportation, but no differences were found between groups. Body temperature decreased during transportation in both groups, but this reduction was faster in acepromazine-treated animals. Comparison of blood parameters before and after transport revealed significantly lower red blood cell counts and haemoglobin concentrations after transport in treated animals compared with control animals; a reduction in lymphocyte count, eosinophil count and serum creatinine levels over transport in treated animals; a decrease in serum potassium levels over transport in the control group; an increase in serum creatine kinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities over transport in control animals; an increase in serum urea and chloride concentrations over transport in both groups; and finally, a decrease in serum glucose concentrations in both groups. These results demonstrate the suitability of acepromazine in transport operations in order to reduce the stress response and prevent its adverse effects in roe deer.
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia manifest as reduced motivation and pleasure (MAP) and impaired emotional expressivity (EXP). These can occur as primary phenomena, but have also been suggested to occur secondary to other clinical factors, including antipsychotic-induced sedation. However, this relationship has not been established formally. Here, we examined the effect of antipsychotic-induced sedation (assessed via the proxy of total daily sleep duration) on MAP and EXP in a cohort of 187 clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia followed for over 2 years on average, using multilevel regression and mediation models. MAP, but not EXP, was adversely influenced by sedation, independently of the severity of psychosis or depression. Moreover, clozapine impaired MAP indirectly by worsening sedation, but after accounting for clozapine-induced sedation, clozapine improved MAP. Our results highlight the importance of addressing sedative side-effects of antipsychotics to improve clinical outcomes.
Subjective response (SR) to antipsychotic medication is relevant for quality of life, adherence and recovery. Here, we evaluate (1) the extent of variation in SR in patients using a single antipsychotic; (2) the association between subjective and symptomatic response; and (3) predictors of SR.
Methods
Open-label, single treatment condition with amisulpride in 339 patients with a first episode of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, at most minimally treated before inclusion. Patients were evaluated at baseline, before start with amisulpride and after four weeks of treatment with the Subjective Wellbeing under Neuroleptic scale, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.
Results
(1) 26.8% of the patients had a substantial favorable SR, and 12.4% of the patients experienced a substantial dysphoric SR during treatment with amisulpride. (2) Modest positive associations were found between SR and 4 weeks change on symptom subscales (r = 0.268–0.390, p values < 0.001). (3) Baseline affective symptoms contributed to the prediction of subjective remission, demographic characteristics did not. Lower start dosage of amisulpride was associated with a more favorable SR (r = −0.215, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
We conclude that variation in individual proneness for an unfavorable SR is substantial and only modestly associated with symptomatic response. We need earlier identification of those most at risk for unfavorable SR and research into interventions to improve SR to antipsychotic medication in those at risk.
A combination of olanzapine and the opioid receptor antagonist samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) has been approved in the United States for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia or adults with bipolar I disorder. In a phase 3 study in adults with schizophrenia (ENLIGHTEN-2), OLZ/SAM treatment was associated with significantly less weight gain compared with olanzapine. Prespecified subgroup analyses explored the consistency of the weight mitigation effect of OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine across demographic subgroups in ENLIGHTEN-2.
Methods
The multicenter, randomized, double-blind ENLIGHTEN-2 study (NCT02694328) included outpatients aged 18–55 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia based on DSM-5 criteria, a body mass index (BMI) of 18 to 30 kg/m2, and stable body weight (self-reported change ≤5% for ≥3 months before study entry). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive OLZ/SAM or olanzapine for 24 weeks. Co-primary endpoints (previously reported) were percent change in body weight and proportion of patients with at least 10% weight gain from baseline at week 24. Prespecified exploratory subgroup analyses by sex, age, self-reported race, and baseline BMI were conducted.
Results
At week 24, treatment with OLZ/SAM resulted in numerically less percent weight gain than with olanzapine across all subgroups evaluated. The proportion of patients with at least 10% weight gain was smaller in each subgroup treated with OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine.
Conclusion
In these exploratory subgroup analyses from the ENLIGHTEN-2 study, weight-mitigating effects of OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine were observed consistently across patient subgroups and were in line with results from the overall study population.
Relatively few studies have explored the differential contributions of the accumulative dosage of psychotropic medications on mortality in patients with schizophrenia.
Methods
We aimed to explore the effects of the exposure dosage of psychotropic medications on mortality during a follow-up period of 5 years with a national cohort of individuals with schizophrenia in 2010. Causes of death were linked through Taiwan's National Mortality Registry. The mean defined daily dose of antipsychotics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and sedative-hypnotics, were calculated and survival analyses were conducted.
Results
A total of 102 964 individuals (54 151 men, 52.59%) with schizophrenia were included. Compared to patients with no exposure to antipsychotics, those with antipsychotic exposure had better survival outcomes, regardless of antipsychotic dosage. Antidepressant exposure, in low and moderate dosage, was associated with decreased all-cause mortality; exposure to mood stabilizers appeared to be associated with an increase in all-cause mortality. Although 89.7% of the patients had been prescribed sedative-hypnotics, exposure to sedative-hypnotics was associated with dose-related increased mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) in low dose group: 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.27; HR in moderate dose: 1.32, 95% CI 1.21–1.44; HR in high dose: 1.83, 95% CI 1.67–2.01)].
Conclusions
The results indicate that in the treatment of schizophrenia, antipsychotics and antidepressants are associated with lower mortality when using adequate dosages and mood stabilizers and sedative-hypnotics with higher mortality compared with no use. Furthermore, exposure to sedative-hypnotics is associated with a dose-related increased mortality risk which warrants clinical attention and further study.
Sexual dysfunction (SD) can often be a side-effect of treatment with antipsychotics (APS). It often jeopardizes long-term adherence to treatment, while deeply affecting the patient’s quality of life. The pathogenic mechanisms may be associated with postsynaptic dopamine antagonism, a1-antagonism and prolactin elevation. APS-induced hyperprolactinemia has been linked to the occurrence of galactorrhea, gynecomastia, amenorrhea and SD.
Objectives
To synthesize the available evidence on the management of APS-related sexual dysfunction, with a main focus on the second-generation antipsychotics.
Methods
A search for randomized controlled trials (RCT) published between 2021 and 2011 on PubMed was made using the keywords “sexual”; “dysfunction”; “antipsychotic” and “treatment”, from which resulted sixteen articles. Only six of those were considered relevant for the study’s objectives.
Results
Three studies focused on the comparison between different APS and prolactin levels and SD occurrence, showing that treatment with aripiprazole is mostly related to prolactin levels with the normal range and a lower incidence of sexual dysfunction. Addition of aripiprazole to previous APS may be associated with normalization of sexual function and pose as a possible management option. Adjunctive treatment with tadalafil showed no significant effect on its primary outcome.
Conclusions
There seems to be a general consensus that patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGA), along with risperidone, paliperidone and amissulpride show higher prolactin levels and incidence of SD. Whether there is a causal relationship between these two variables still remains a question. Larger and more prolonged trials are still needed to evaluate APS-related sexual dysfunction and its management.
Priapism is an abnormally prolonged erection, painful and irreducible, unrelated to sexual stimulation. Around 25-40% of cases are iatrogenic, especially associated with pharmacological treatments, of which antipsychotics (first and second generation) account for 50%.
Objectives
The aim is to discuss a clinical case to provide further evidence.
Methods
The patient was a 37-year-old man with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who was admitted for clinical decompensation. He had stopped antipsychotic treatment three months earlier due to side effects. He reported previous episodes of priapism associated with Risperidone, Aripiprazole, Olanzapine, and Paliperidone. At admission, he was administered Asenapine 20mg with development of priapism. Treatment was stopped. The urologists performed a lavage of the corpora cavernosa and administered adrenaline. In the absence of effectiveness, surgical intervention was successfully performed. Given the psychopathological improvement, he was discharged without antipsychotic treatment and close follow-up.
Results
He presented a new admission one month later. Amisulpride was prescribed up to 800mg/day with good evolution and no adverse effects.
Conclusions
Antipsychotic-induced priapism appears to be related to the blockade of alpha-1 adrenergic receptors in the corpora cavernosa. There is a positive correlation between the affinity for the receptor and the propensity to cause priapism. The dose and duration of the medication do not appear to be correlated. Other risk factors are a history of previous episodes, restarting medication after noncompliance, use of concomitant substances or medications that cause priapism. Our choice of amisulpride was based on the fact that it has no affinity for alpha-1 adrenergic receptors.
At present, there is no universally approach to treating patients at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) without comorbid mental disorders. However, if there are revealed depressive symptoms, proper treatment becomes necessary.
Objectives
Establish pharmacological classes and doses of drugs that have proved effective in treating depressive patients at CHR.
Methods
A comparative study of pharmacological classes and doses of drugs was carried out, showing the effectiveness in treatment of 219 depressive patients at CHR and 52 depressive patients without CHR. The treatment effectiveness was carried out on the reduction of depression symptoms on the HDRS scale, and the CHR symptoms on the SOPS scale.
Results
A significant reduction of depression symptoms was achieved in the group of depressive patients with and without CHR on the HDRS scale (67.9% and 76.6% respectively). The reductions of the CHR symptoms were 46.1% and 53.3% respectively. There were differences between the severity of depression symptoms and CHR symptoms before and after the treatment. Both groups used antidepressants followed by the prescription of antipsychotics to increase the effectiveness of the therapy. No difference was found in the doses of antidepressants for the fluoxetine equivalent (46.0 vs 42.6 mg per day, p 0.05) and some differences were found for the average effective doses of antipsychotics for the chlorpromazine equivalent (385.4 vs 230.8 mg per day, p 0.05).
Conclusions
The same pharmacological classes are used for the treatment of young depressive patients with and without CHR, but the former have significantly higher doses of antipsychotics.
Delusional disorder (DD) is defined by the presence of one or more delusions, of at least one month’s duration, in the absence of prominent hallucinations or other symptoms of schizophrenia. Although functioning may not be markedly impaired, the delusion(s) or its ramifications may have a significant impact in the patient’s life. With a life-time prevalence of 0.18%, DD is still neglected in terms of approved treatment recommendations.
Objectives
We present the case of a patient diagnosed with DD and discuss the treatment of DD according to current evidence.
Methods
Relevant clinical information was extracted from the patient’s clinical process. A non-systematic review was made in Pubmed database with the terms “Delusional Disorder” and “Treatment”.
Results
Male, 76 years old, divorced, living alone, autonomous. First admitted at age 62 in our inpatient psychiatry ward for a persecutory delusion regarding his neighbors. He was discharged with the diagnosis of DD and started a follow-up in a mental health community team. He abandoned treatment and psychiatric consultation after 9 years. During 17 years he moved home more than 10 times due to a progressive dynamism of the delusion, leading to recent marked behavior changes towards his neighbors. He is again admitted in our inpatient psychiatry ward.
Conclusions
This case illustrates the impact that untreated DD can have on its patients. Although consensus using antipsychotics, there are still insufficient studies to make evidence-based recommendations to treat people with DD. Further research is needed in this sense.
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) hold an important place in the treatment of psychosis. Knowledge of the best way to administer LAIs is important to maximize the efficacy and minimize the side-effects
Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of flexible doses of palmitate paliperidone long-acting injectable (PPLAI) against standard doses in initiation regimen in the subset of acutely hospitalized patients with schizophrenia and other psychosis
Methods
Retrospective, noninterventional study. Group of initiation regimen: A)“Standard-doses” (recommended PPLAI initiation regimen: 150mg-Day-1 and 100mg-Day-8±4days), B)“Low-doses” (any dosage lower than the Standard-dose) C)“High-doses” (150mg-Day-1 and 150mg-Day-8±4days) Effectiveness was measured with the number of psychiatric hospital admission and psychiatric emergency visit 6-months post-discharge. Length of stay of the index hospitalization, adherence to treatment and adverse events was confirmed in the medical record. Concomitant use of biperiden was recorded.
Results
51 patients were included. We found no statistically differences in study variables between groups (Table-1). Table-1.
Standard doses(n=31)
Low-doses(n=13)
High-doses(n=7)
Length of stay mean±sd
17.23±13.09
13.77±9.02
17±10.55
No psychiatric hospitalizations 6-month post-discharge, %patients( n)
71%(n=22)
84.6%(n=11)
85.7%(n=6)
No psychiatric emergency visits 6-month post-discharge, %patients(n)
61.3%(n=19)
69.2%(n=9)
85.7%(n=6)
Prescription of biperiden 6-month post-discharge, %patients(n)
13.3%(n=4)
0%(n=0)
14.3%(n=1)
Adherence to treatment 6-month post-discharge, %patients(n)
80.6%(n=25)
84.61%(n=11)
57.1%(n=4)
Conclusions
No differences were found in the effectiveness of flexible-doses in PPLAI initiation regimen. The use of low doses of PPLAI could keep the efficacy of the standard dose with a better side effect profile and treatment adherence. The strength of the conclusion is limited by the design and the number of patients.
Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by qualitative impairments in social interaction, communication, and restricted and repetitive behaviors [1]. Despite of these symptoms, some patients present different manifestations of irritability. These can be expressed in different kinds of disruptive behaviors. Recent studies shown that, at least 20% of children with autism present irritability symptoms, which cause severe social and familiar disturbances [2].
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate short-term efficacy of aripiprazole in children in comparison with other antipsychotic. We include behaviors related to irritability as all kinds of aggressions, tantrums and self-injuries.
Methods
90 patients were recruited. 45 of the patients received aripiprazole and 45 received other antipsychotic. The initial doses of aripiprazole was 2,5 mg/day. Doses were increase related to symptoms. The range of the doses were from 2,5 to 15 mg/day.
Results
From these 45 patients 12 had a relapse (26,6%) during the next two years. From the second group, 20 (44.4%) of the patients had a relapse during the next two years. Five of the aripiprazole group (11,1%) abandon treatment. From the second group twelve patients (26.6%) also abandon treatment. Prolactin rates with aripiprazole were 28.2 ng/ml for males and 14.1 ng/ml for women.
Conclusions
In general, the result of our research indicated that Aripiprazole was effective and generally safe and well tolerated in the treatment of irritability associated with ASD. One of the limitations was that we do not use scales in order to measure the changes.
Tobacco-use is currently one of the major public health problems and is more common among patients with schizophrenia.
Objectives
We aimed in this study to estimate the prevalence of smoking in a population of patients with schizophrenia, to assess tobacco dependence and to identify its correlated factors.
Methods
This is a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study carried out on 50 outpatients at the Department of Psychiatry (Tunisia) over a period of two months. For the data collection, we used: a general questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco consumption and the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence.
Results
All the patients were male with a mean age of 32.7±7.02 years and 84% of them were tobacco consumers. More than half of the sample were single (68%) and had a primary school level (52%). A professional irregularity and low socio-economic level were found successively in 84% and 78% of cases. Half of the patients (52%) were diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and 46% of them were treated by atypical antipsychotics. Cigarette dependence was strong or very strong in 82% according to the Fagerstrom test. A positive correlation was found between strong tobacco dependence on the one hand and low socio-economic level, professional irregularity, smoking in a first-degree relative and treatment with a typical neuroleptic on the other hand.
Conclusions
Our study and data from the literature show that subjects with schizophrenia constitute a population of highly dependent smokers. A smoking cessation assistance program for this vulnerable population is a priority to improve their quality of life.