We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The role and importance of cognitive factors in the development and maintenance of insomnia have been well recognised for some time. Indeed, insomnia is characterised by several types of challenging thoughts, and these, coupled with hyperarousal, lead to difficulties sleeping. This chapter describes the role of cognitive factors in insomnia and describes in depth a range of cognitive techniques, their background, and the evidence for them. A number of cognitive techniques are described, including cognitive control, paradoxical intention, articulatory suppression, imagery-training, mindfulness, cognitive restructuring, and problem-solving. For each therapeutic, the reader is provided with specific instructions and narratives to follow to aid in their implementation when working with a patient.
Various areas in psychology are interested in whether specific processes underlying judgments and behavior operate in an automatic or nonautomatic fashion. In social psychology, valuable insights can be gained from evidence on whether and how judgments and behavior under suboptimal processing conditions differ from judgments and behavior under optimal processing conditions. In personality psychology, valuable insights can be gained from individual differences in behavioral tendencies under optimal and suboptimal processing conditions. The current chapter provides a method-focused overview of different features of automaticity (e.g., unintentionality, efficiency, uncontrollability, unconsciousness), how these features can be studied empirically, and pragmatic issues in research on automaticity. Expanding on this overview, the chapter describes the procedures of extant implicit measures and the value of implicit measures for studying automatic processes in judgments and behavior. The chapter concludes with a discussion of pragmatic issues in research using implicit measures.
We examined how relative language dominance impacts Spanish–English bilinguals’ crosslinguistic and nonlinguistic interference resolution abilities during a web-based Spanish picture-word interference naming task and a subsequent spatial Stroop paradigm, and the relationship between the two. Results show the expected interference and facilitation effects in the online setting across both tasks. Additionally, participants with greater English dominance had larger within-language, Spanish facilitation and marginally larger crosslinguistic (English to Spanish) interference effects reflected on accuracy performance. Similarly, participants with greater English dominance had larger nonlinguistic congruency facilitation effects. Our results are in line with other studies finding a relation between linguistic and nonlinguistic cognitive control. Correlated reaction time performance between the linguistic and nonlinguistic paradigms suggests that overcoming crosslinguistic interference may be partly based on cognitive control processes used outside of language. Modulations by language dominance underline the importance of accounting for relative language proficiency in bilinguals’ two languages when studying bilingualism.
Individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) can experience reduced motivation and cognitive function, leading to challenges with goal-directed behavior. When selecting goals, people maximize ‘expected value’ by selecting actions that maximize potential reward while minimizing associated costs, including effort ‘costs’ and the opportunity cost of time. In MDD, differential weighing of costs and benefits are theorized mechanisms underlying changes in goal-directed cognition and may contribute to symptom heterogeneity.
Methods
We used the Effort Foraging Task to quantify cognitive and physical effort costs, and patch leaving thresholds in low effort conditions (reflecting perceived opportunity cost of time) and investigated their shared versus distinct relationships to clinical features in participants with MDD (N = 52, 43 in-episode) and comparisons (N = 27).
Results
Contrary to our predictions, none of the decision-making measures differed with MDD diagnosis. However, each of the measures was related to symptom severity, over and above effects of ability (i.e. performance). Greater anxiety symptoms were selectively associated with lower cognitive effort cost (i.e. greater willingness to exert effort). Anhedonia and behavioral apathy were associated with increased physical effort costs. Finally, greater overall depression was related to decreased patch leaving thresholds.
Conclusions
Markers of effort-based decision-making may inform understanding of MDD heterogeneity. Increased willingness to exert cognitive effort may contribute to anxiety symptoms such as worry. Decreased leaving threshold associations with symptom severity are consistent with reward rate-based accounts of reduced vigor in MDD. Future research should address subtypes of depression with or without anxiety, which may relate differentially to cognitive effort decisions.
A broad and extensive literature has investigated the cognitive consequences of bilingualism on cognitive control. Results from these studies, while controversial, support the conclusion that speaking a second language confers non-linguistic benefits. Whether other related linguistic experiences, such as dialect use, confer similar benefits remains an underexplored and open question. The common use of a diverse range of local dialects across China provides ideal conditions under which to explore this question. Using a dialectally heterogeneous sample of Mandarin-English bilingual young adults (n = 74), the present study investigated whether differences in dialect proficiency impacted on inhibition and attentional control while accounting for variation in language experience. Dialect proficiency was not associated with improved performance on the Simon task, Attention Network Test, or Flanker task, suggesting no benefits in inhibition or attentional control. Considerations for future studies investigating the influence of Chinese dialect experience on cognitive control are discussed.
Processing speed and cognitive control show a negative correlation. The more automatic a behavior the less cognitive control is needed and the information is processed faster. Faster processing allows the system to integrate more content efficiently. The chapter uncovers how this interaction between processing speed and cognitive control is influenced by age; task type and complexity; targeted cognitive functions; and children’s language skills. Although the analysis of the relationship between processing speed and cognitive control reveals notable individual differences, monolingual children with developmental language disorder (DLD) generally perform slower than their typically developing peers, whereas bilingual children often outperform their monolingual peers in processing speed. Bilingual children with DLD provide an unparalleled opportunity to study the joint effects of bilingualism and DLD on processing speed. The preliminary findings suggest that bilingualism does attenuate the negative effects of DLD but only in simple task conditions.
The complex interactions between cognitive control and language ability and those between cognitive control and language proficiency are reviewed first separately and then in relationship to each other, and in association with the development of academic skills and social interactions. Both behavioral and neurophysiological studies suggest that language ability and proficiency modulate the engagement of cognitive control processes, particularly working memory, attention, and interference control. Thus, better language abilities and higher bilingual language proficiencies are associated with superior cognitive control performance, whereas language disorder and low bilingual language proficiency are linked to weaker cognitive control performance. Response inhibition, however, does not show a close link with language skills; children with different language abilities and proficiencies may perform similarly on tasks of response inhibition. Age, prior experience, and variation in task types may all influence these relationships.
The Introduction provides a brief review of the overall aims and conceptual and methodological approaches of the book, with a focus on the dynamic interactions between cognitive control and language. It highlights the interdisciplinary nature of the discussions and the integration of behavioral and neurophysiological outcomes throughout the chapters. A further goal is to point to the need for a connection between theoretical models and educational/clinical practices and to facilitate a discussion between researchers and educators/clinicians. The Introduction also includes a short summary of each chapter by presenting the main ideas and critical issues about the development of cognitive control in children with various language skills (e.g., children with language talent, children with bilingualism as their first language, children with developmental language disorder, emerging bilingual speakers).
This chapter provides an overview of the interactions among language, cognition, and social context by examining how individuals with different language abilities and varying language proficiencies respond to assorted social-communicative demands. The analysis of the social context reveals how local (e.g., language register use) and global (e.g., culture, socioeconomic status) changes affect children’s cognitive control and language performance, as indicated by neural and behavioral findings. Social context at the local level is more dynamically changing than the context at the global level, which is more predictable. Children rely on different cognitive control functions in neutral, cooperative, and competitive social contexts. They adapt their cognitive system more efficiently in cooperative and competitive contexts, compared to a neutral one. Children’s behavior across these social situations is most strongly influenced by their age, cultural background, socioeconomic status, language skills, and emotion regulation.
This chapter introduces the key concepts and major theoretical accounts of cognitive control (e.g., conflict monitoring, the expected value of control) that seek to answer fundamental questions about the control mechanisms, the recruitment of control resources, the selection of task-relevant processes, and the prevention of interference. Although some of the theories focus more on the regulatory processes, while others on the evaluative mechanisms, most of them complement each other. Essential questions, such as the sources of capacity limitations, the continuum between control and automaticity, cognitive flexibility as a marker, the effects of contextual changes, and individual differences in both behavioral performance and neural activity are critically discussed throughout the chapter. The most widely used behavioral paradigms and their outcome measures (e.g., congruency effects, intrusion cost, switching cost, practice effects, post-error slowing and post-error reduction of interference) are presented and linked to different conceptual constructs.
The effects of age on language and cognitive control development are examined in monolingual and bilingual speakers, in typically developing children, in early, and late talkers. Individual differences in language acquisition are linked to the development of other nonlinguistic cognitive abilities, brain maturation, and environmental factors. Particularly for the early years, developmental trends and converging and diverging cognitive-linguistic processes are identified. Developmental changes in error patterns, learning styles, and strategy use are analyzed between early and late bilingual speakers and between typically developing children and late talkers. Challenges related to the variability in both first language acquisition and second language learning are discussed and links between early language development and later academic performance are identified. Age-related changes in cognitive control functions and their interactions with language are discussed for speakers with different language abilities and proficiencies.
This chapter describes how the quality and quantity of language input affects both children’s language ability and their cognitive control development. A nuanced exploration of the distinctions between input and intake as well as between input and exposure points to a complex pattern of interactions among these components and children’s communicative skills. The interactions among parental input, language environment, and the child’s age, as well as communicative abilities are bidirectional and affect children’s cognitive control skills, particularly working memory and interference control. The dynamic nature of caregiver – child interactions is also reflected in the manner parents adjust their language input based on their children’s communicative abilities. Parents of children with superior language skills used more elaborated language than did the parents of children with language delay, but those who participated in parental intervention increased the language and cognitive stimulation of their children.
Cognitive control (CC) involves a top–down mechanism to flexibly respond to complex stimuli and is impaired in schizophrenia.
Methods
This study investigated the impact of increasing complexity of CC processing in 140 subjects with psychosis and 39 healthy adults, with assessments of behavioral performance, neural regions of interest and symptom severity.
Results
The lowest level of CC (Stroop task) was impaired in all patients; the intermediate level of CC (Faces task) with explicit emotional information was most impaired in patients with first episode psychosis. Patients showed activation of distinct neural CC and reward networks, but iterative learning based on the higher-order of CC during the trust game, was most impaired in chronic schizophrenia. Subjects with first episode psychosis, and patients with lower symptom load, demonstrate flexibility of the CC network to facilitate learning, which appeared compromised in the more chronic stages of schizophrenia.
Conclusion
These data suggest optimal windows for opportunities to introduce therapeutic interventions to improve CC.
The Adaptive Control Hypothesis and the Control Process Model propose that bilingual language use in different interactional contexts requires control processes that can adapt in different ways to linguistic demands. This study explored the effects of language experience on cognitive flexibility and inhibition among 41 Chinese–English bilingual adults. In particular, it aimed to investigate the relationship between spontaneous language production (i.e., bilingual conversation and narration tasks) and cognitive control. Participants’ inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility efficiency was measured through verbal and spatial Stroop tasks, and a colour-shape switching task. Overall, it showed that frequent practices of intersentential switching in speech production resulted in significant facilitatory effects in both verbal and nonverbal inhibitory control. This study provides new evidence for the importance of bilingual language experience in adaptive cognitive control in naturalistic speech production and furthers our theoretical knowledge of the relationship between the language system and crucial domain-general cognitive processes.
In this chapter, we delve into the intricate domains of working memory (WM) and executive functions (EFs), two pivotal cognitive processes. We elucidate WM, delineate its subcomponents, and elucidate the tasks employed to evaluate them. The chapter explores the neural foundations of WM and EFs, spotlighting the key brain regions and networks implicated in these cognitive operations. We unravel the developmental trajectory of WM throughout childhood and adolescence, emphasizing the underlying brain changes fueling this progression. A distinction is made between cool EFs, which function in emotionally neutral contexts, and hot EFs, which govern behavior in high-stakes scenarios. We underscore the influence of WM and EFs on academic achievement, especially in educational and problem-solving contexts. The chapter also provides insights into strategies for enhancing academic performance by either minimizing WM and EF demands or refining these cognitive faculties.
As part of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, the NIMH seeks to improve experimental measures of cognitive and positive valence systems for use in intervention research. However, many RDoC tasks have not been psychometrically evaluated as a battery of measures. Our aim was to examine the factor structure of 7 such tasks chosen for their relevance to schizophrenia and other forms of serious mental illness. These include the n-back, Sternberg, and self-ordered pointing tasks (measures of the RDoC cognitive systems working memory construct); flanker and continuous performance tasks (measures of the RDoC cognitive systems cognitive control construct); and probabilistic learning and effort expenditure for reward tasks (measures of reward learning and reward valuation constructs).
Participants and Methods:
The sample comprised 286 cognitively healthy participants who completed novel versions of all 7 tasks via an online recruitment platform, Prolific, in the summer of 2022. The mean age of participants was 38.6 years (SD = 14.5, range 18-74), 52% identified as female, and stratified recruitment ensured an ethnoracially diverse sample. Excluding time for instructions and practice, each task lasted approximately 6 minutes. Task order was randomized. We estimated optimal scores from each task including signal detection d-prime measures for the n-back, Sternberg, and continuous performance task, mean accuracy for the flanker task, win-stay to win-shift ratio for the probabilistic learning task, and trials completed for the effort expenditure for reward task. We used parallel analysis and a scree plot to determine the number of latent factors measured by the 7 task scores. Exploratory factor analysis with oblimin (oblique) rotation was used to examine the factor loading matrix.
Results:
The scree plot and parallel analyses of the 7 task scores suggested three primary factors. The flanker and continuous performance task both strongly loaded onto the first factor, suggesting that these measures are strong indicators of cognitive control. The n-back, Sternberg, and self-ordered pointing tasks strongly loaded onto the second factor, suggesting that these measures are strong indicators of working memory. The probabilistic learning task solely loaded onto the third factor, suggesting that it is an independent indicator of reinforcement learning. Finally, the effort expenditure for reward task modestly loaded onto the second but not the first and third factors, suggesting that effort is most strongly related to working memory.
Conclusions:
Our aim was to examine the factor structure of 7 RDoC tasks. Results support the RDoC suggestion of independent cognitive control, working memory, and reinforcement learning. However, effort is a factorially complex construct that is not uniquely or even most strongly related to positive valance. Thus, there is reason to believe that the use of at least 6 of these tasks are appropriate measures of constructs such as working memory, reinforcement learning and cognitive control.
Cognitive deficits in first-episode psychosis (FEP) are well documented, particularly aspects of cognitive control, which is one of the primary hypothesized functions of the frontoparietal network (FPN). The clinical features of psychotic disorders are known to differ between men and women, but little work has systematically studied neurobiological differences between the sexes, particularly in FEP. The current study aimed to examine sexual dimorphisms in structural integrity of the frontoparietal network (FPN) and its role in cognitive control in FEP.
Participants and Methods:
A total of 111 FEP patients (68 male, 43 female) and 55 healthy control participants (35 male, 20 female) from the Human Connectome Project for Early Psychosis underwent T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological testing were included in the study. Regions of interest (ROIs) included: left and right superior frontal gyrus, left and right middle frontal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, left and right inferior parietal gyrus, right caudate and left thalamus. Using high-dimensional brain mapping procedures, surface shape of the caudate and thalamus was characterized using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping, and cortical thickness of frontal and parietal regions was estimated using the FreeSurfer toolkit. Cognitive control was assessed using the Fluid Cognition Composite score from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Multivariate ANOVA models tested group differences, separated by sex, in cortical thickness ROIs, in addition to a whole-brain vertex-wise analysis. Vertex-wise statistical surface t-maps evaluated differences in subcortical surface shape, and Pearson correlations tested relationships between brain regions and Fluid Cognition performance.
Results:
Results of deep brain region comparisons between schizophrenia males (SCZM) and schizophrenia females (SCZF) groups revealed significant outward deformation at the tail of the right caudate and significant inward deformation along the dorsal aspects of the right caudate. Additionally, significant inward deformation in multiple nuclei of the left thalamus were revealed. Significant negative relationships between Fluid Cognition and the left superior/middle frontal gyrus (r = -0.24, p = 0.05) in the male FEP group were observed. Additionally, significant positive relationships between Fluid Cognition and left inferior frontal gyrus (r = 0.35, p = 0.02) and left inferior parietal gyrus (r = 0.35, p = 0.02) in the female FEP group were found.
Conclusions:
Overall, findings revealed significant brain differences of the FPN in deep-brain structures only, including abnormal caudal and thalamic shape, in male FEP compared to female FEP, providing evidence of the importance to examine sex differences in deep-brain regions at the first episode. Differential brain relationships with cognitive control also highlight sex-specific presentations that may aid in clinical management and further characterization of the illness in early stages.
Pain is a mechanism for attention disruption due, in part, to a shared reliance on the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Amongst older adults, the experience of pain is both prevalent and functionally impactful. Dual-task walking (DTW) paradigms are a useful means of assessing the impact of pain on attentional control and known to be sensitive to changes in the cortical hemodynamic response within the PFC. To date, however, few studies have utilized such paradigms to examine the impact of self-reported pain on attentional control via assessment of cognitive, gait and neuroimaging outcomes. Examining these associations would facilitate a better understanding of the ways in which pain may negatively impact neural efficiency, thereby increasing risk of adverse functional outcomes, in healthy aging.
Participants and Methods:
Study participants (N= 408; mean age = 76 ± 6.5ys; % female =55.4) were grouped into pain (n= 266) and no pain (n= 142) groups based upon their responses on the MOS-PSS and MOS-PES. These questionnaires were also used to assess self-reported levels of pain severity and interference amongst individuals with reported pain. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was used to measure intraindividual variability (IIV) of the cortical hemodynamic response within the PFC during a DTW paradigm which consisted of Single-Task-Walk (STW), Cognitive Interference (Alpha), and Dual-Task-Walk (DTW) conditions. Participants walked along an electronic walkway and quantitative gait data were extracted in order to assess IIV in stride length during STW and DTW conditions. The rate of correct letter generation was used as a measure of cognitive accuracy during Alpha and DTW conditions. Linear mixed effects models (LMEMs) were used to examine the effects of perceived pain on neural and behavioral responses as well as on the change in these outcomes form single- to dual-task conditions. Stratified LMEMs were used to examine whether these associations differed by gender.
Results:
LMEMs revealed that perceived pain presence was associated with reduced IIV in PFC oxygenation (estimate = -0.032, p = 0.037) and reduced IIV in stride length in the DTW condition (estimate = -1.180, p = 0.006). High pain severity was associated with a greater increase in stride length IIV from STW to DTW (estimate = -1.301, p = 0.039). Stratified LMEMs revealed that the association between pain and neural IIV was significant in only males (estimate = -0.049, p = 0.037), while the association between pain and gait IIV was significant in only females (estimate = -1.712, p = .008).
Conclusions:
Study results suggest that self-reported pain over one month is associated with differential patterns of neural and behavioral responding amongst healthy, community-dwelling older adults. Furthermore, it appears that males are more susceptible to the neural effects of pain, while females are more susceptible to the behavioral effects under attention-demanding conditions. In this population, these patterns may reflect a tendency towards inefficient neural and behavioral modifications in response to perceived pain. These findings highlight the need for clinical use of routine pain assessments and, when appropriate, the implementation of timely and effective pain treatments in aging.
Because cognitive resources are limited, models of cognitive control predict that additional control is engaged only if it improves task performance. Increased response caution, which occurs when individuals increase the threshold of information needed before making a decision, is one example of cognitive control adaptation. While previous studies have measured increased response caution via increased reaction time, the diffusion model can be used to derive a boundary separation parameter that directly indexes response caution and eliminates capturing alternative influences on reaction time. This study aims to determine if school-aged children, either with or without ADHD, show adaptive changes in response caution during a set-shifting task. These groups have demonstrated mixed results when analyzing reaction time, so this study utilizes diffusion modeling to measure response caution more directly. The set-shifting task presents switches in a random order such that they cannot be predicted; therefore, increasing response caution is only adaptive following errors, called post-error slowing (PES), but not following switch trials. It is predicted that children will show increased response caution only when adaptive. If child with ADHD adapt their response caution fundamentally differently, then there will be individual differences in change in boundary separation.
Participants and Methods:
Children ages 8-12 with (n=193) and without (n=70) ADHD completed the Navon set-shifting task. Participants saw one of four global shapes made up of local shapes and were asked to identify one or the other based upon the background color. Of the 144 trials, 70 presented a switch between global and local. Trials were presented in the same randomized order for all participants, self-paced, and followed by feedback on correctness. The diffusion model parameters boundary separation (a), drift rate (v), and nondecision time (Ter) were estimated by condition, including a) post-error versus after correct and b) post-switch versus post-same. For PES analyses, only participants with a sufficient number of errors for modeling were included (ADHD n=113, control n=19).
Results:
Participants were slower on trials immediately following errors (F(1, 130)=119.76, p<.001, n2=.48) and switches (F(1, 261)=154.93, p<.001, n2=.37). In PES, slowing was attributable to increased boundary separation, F(1, 130)=16.11, p<.001, n2=.11, as well as slower drift rate and longer nondecision time (both p<.01, n2 >.05). However, as predicted, post-switch slowing was only attributable slower drift rate and longer nondecision time (both p<.001, n2 >.10), not increased boundary separation, F(1, 261)=0.77, p=.38, n2<.01. Overall, children with ADHD had slower drift rates (F(1, 261)=4.63, p<.001, n2=.10) and narrower boundary separation (F(1, 261)=10.56, p=.001, n2=.04). However, there were no ADHD x trial-type interactions for PES or post-switch (both p>.33, n2<.01).
Conclusions:
School-aged children demonstrated increased response caution following errors, but not following switches. This demonstrates an adaptive use of cognitive control. The diffusion model was crucial in determining this, as reaction time slowed following switches for reasons unrelated to cognitive control. Additionally, although children with ADHD demonstrated slower drift rates and narrower boundary separation overall, they showed no differences when adapting response caution.
Cognitive fatigue (CF) is a common, yet poorly understood symptom in neurological disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, stroke). Studies show that reward plays a central role in CF. For instance, introducing or increasing reward often improves task performance. It is less clear, however, how reward affects subjective (self-reported) CF (SCF). This study examined the effect of reward type (monetary or performance feedback) and frequency (infrequent or frequent) on SF.
Participants and Methods:
In an online between-subjects study, 400 participants completed a computerized cognitive switching task and were randomly grouped into one of the five possible groups based on reward condition: [1] infrequent monetary reward, [2] frequent monetary reward, [3] infrequent performancefeedback reward, [4] frequent performance feedback reward, and [5] a no-reward group. SCF was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale of Fatigue (VAS-F) during the task. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the influence of reward type and frequency on task performance and SCF.
Results:
We found that the monetary groups were significantly faster (p<.001) compared to the feedback and no-reward groups, and that the frequent group was faster (p=.05) compared to the infrequent group. Reward type and frequency did not have a significant effect on VAS-F scores. However, when we looked at each reward group, we found that the monetary-infrequent reward group was associated with a decrease in VAS-F scores on average compared to the no-reward group (p=.04).
Conclusions:
The type and frequency of reward influence aspects of task performance (response time but not accuracy). Findings suggest that money had a greater effect on response time and may decrease SCF in cognitively healthy individuals when provided infrequently. Future studies should examine how these findings translate to clinical populations. Continued work is needed to understand how and which specific behavioral reward manipulations reduce fatigue, which could eventually lead to improved assessment and our ability to target fatigue across clinical populations.