This study aims to assess the effect of primary health care (PHC) service provision continuity on inpatient admissions for people with chronic diseases in Estonia.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) were collectively responsible for more than 7 out of 10 deaths worldwide in 2019. As the burden of NCDs increases, PHC has an increased role of coordinating care management. High-performing PHC can reduce unnecessary hospitalizations. Estonia has a strong PHC system focusing on multidisciplinary care. Yet it has not been evaluated for its effect on hospitalizations. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate PHC continuity to improve care for NCD patients.

This study used routinely collected electronic medical billing data of the Estonian population aged 15 years or older from 2005 to 2020 identifying patients with seven ambulatory care sensitive chronic (ACSC) conditions. We developed an indicator to describe the continuity of PHC. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the impact of comorbidities and we controlled the patient’s age, gender, county of residency and socio-economic status. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models with family doctor patient list random effects to assess how the odds of hospitalization depend on continuity of care, allowing for confounders.

We identified that 45% of the adult Estonian population had at least one of the target diagnoses. Among the target population, 96% had contact with their PHC providers. We found that there is a non-linear relationship between PHC continuity and patient outcomes. Any contact with PHC provider during the past 5 years decreases odds for hospitalization, but hospitalization risk is higher for people who are elderly and have higher CCI score. We found that after accounting for patient characteristics, differences among patient lists minimally impact outcomes. Further research should explore policies to better support family doctors in reducing hospitalizations for chronic patients.

Primary health care (PHC) delivered in Austria’s newly established primary health care units (PHCU) is based on interprofessional collaboration (IPC) between health care and social professionals.

This study aims to explore the requirements and challenges in IPC in Austrian PHCUs from the perspective of health care and social professionals.

15 semi-standardized, online, mono-professional focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 58 professionals with the following backgrounds: biomedical sciences, dietetics, medical training therapy, medicine, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, office assistance, orthoptics, pharmacy, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, radiography, social work, and speech therapy. The participants were representatives from PHC practice (especially PHCUs), respective educational institutions, and professional organizations. The data were inductively analysed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

The analysis displayed two main fields discussed by the participants, the setting for IPC and the professional relationships. The content analysis revealed three and four topics, respectively, within the main discussion fields. Within the setting for IPC, these topics were elaborated on (1) the operational area where IPC takes place in PHC, (2) the structural and organizational premises for this cooperation in PHCUs, and (3) the observed benefits of PHCUs for patients. Regarding the professional relationships, these topics were discoursed: (1) successful IPC, (2) challenges in IPC, (3) competencies required for IPC, and (4) previous and present corresponding training content.

Austrian health care and social professionals aim to get more involved in PHC in general and PHCUs specifically. They see opportunities and also challenges for their professional groups. Specific training is desired focusing on the unique requirements of Austrian PHCUs and equipping the workforce for the intensive, necessary, and beneficial collaboration between multiple professional groups in the increasingly important setting.

The escalation of the armed Ukrainian conflict forced millions of refugees to cross borders into neighboring countries, such as Poland, Czech Republic, Republic of Moldova, and Romania. The objective of this manuscript is to report the mission of an Italian Emergency Medical Team (EMT), named CUAMM EMT, deployed to assist Ukrainian refugees sheltered in the Republic of Moldova.

A total of 1,173 patients were admitted to the CUAMM EMT during the period of observation covered in this report (June - December 2022). The majority of patients (88.7%; n = 1,040) had health problems not directly related to the conflicts, while only 3.2% (n = 38) of patients presented diseases directly related to the event. With reference to the World Health Organization (WHO) Minimum Data Set (MDS), the most prevalent diagnosis (66.8%; n = 783) referred to “other diseases, not specified above” (Code 29). Among this group, the majority of diagnosis were attributable to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular diseases (23.4%; n = 177), gastrointestinal diseases (7.4%; n = 56), chronic musculoskeletal diseases (6.1%; n = 46), and cancer (4.7%; n = 36).

The most prevalent diagnoses faced by CUAMM EMT during its deployment referred to health problems not directly related to the conflict. Among them, the majority of cases registered were attributable to NCDs, raising interesting points of discussion concerning the management of these conditions during EMTs disaster deployment.

The Peruvian public healthcare system is characterized by various shortcomings that adversely affect healthcare quality as perceived by the general and minority populations, including the Afro-Peruvian community. This population has demonstrated reduced healthcare access due to discrimination and differential treatment, reflecting broader societal inequities.

This study explores the experiences and perceptions of Afro-Peruvian individuals regarding the treatment they receive from public primary healthcare providers in metropolitan Lima.

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with Afro-Peruvian individuals recruited from Lima. They were selected based on their responses to a survey conducted in a previous study, which indicated a high or low perception of intercultural adaptation in healthcare. The interviews explored their experiences with healthcare services and their perceptions about their interactions with health providers. The qualitative analysis involved topic coding to interpret the data.

We interviewed 19 Afro-Peruvians, including 15 women and 4 men, ages 26 to 70. The findings reveal that Afro-Peruvians generally experience mistreatment in the healthcare system. In their opinion, this is associated with systemic issues such as poor infrastructure, low salaries, and insufficient time allocated for patient care. Furthermore, participants perceive receiving poor quality and inefficient service not only from providers but also from the system presents difficulties in other processes, such as getting the appointment.

This study highlights significant areas for improvement in the public healthcare system, specifically enhancing the quality of patient care, improving communication, and upgrading healthcare infrastructure to serve the Afro-Peruvian community better. These insights could guide the development of targeted policy recommendations and practical interventions to address healthcare disparities and improve access to quality healthcare services for minority populations.

The aim of this study was to explore the role of managers and employees with an assigned responsibility (i.e. inspirers) when integrating recovery-enhancing activities into everyday work in a primary health care setting.

The possibility of recovery during the workday is essential for employee wellbeing. However, the literature on workplace interventions focusing on recovery is scarce. Especially with regard to the importance of local driving forces, like managers and inspirers.

Two focus groups and two individual interviews were conducted in this qualitative interview study. In total, ten managers and inspirers from different primary health care centres were interviewed about their experiences of brief recovery interventions at their workplaces. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and the qualitative analysis was conducted by using systematic text condensation.

From a leadership perspective, two themes with promoting factors for recovery interventions were identified. These were structural promoting factors (including authorisation, communication, and integration) and cultural promoting factors (including attitude, support, and open-mindedness). This knowledge can contribute to future workplace environment development with the focus on recovery during the workday. The results also showed several positive effects of integrated recovery, both on an individual and group level. Hence, this study is a valuable addition to the work recovery research, in terms of understanding the importance of investing in recovery at work.

Early and collaborative interventions are desirable to prevent long-term sick leave and promote sustainable return-to-work (RTW). The aim of this study was to evaluate if the use of the Capacity Note – a brief intervention promoting early and structured communication between general practitioners (GPs), patients, and employers – had an impact on length of sick leave in patients with common mental disorders (CMDs) in primary healthcare.

In a pragmatic trial, GPs at eight primary healthcare centres were randomized to provide the intervention or control and recruited eligible patients: employed women and men, 18-64 years, who visited a GP due to CMD and became or were (<4 months) full- or part-time sick-listed. Patients in the intervention group (n=28) used the Capacity Note in addition to usual care. Patients in the control group (n=28) received usual care. Outcomes of interest were time until full RTW, sick leave status at end of follow-up (17 months), number of sick leave episodes during follow-up, and number of sick leave days at 6, 12, and 17 months of follow-up.

The proportion of patients with full RTW at the end of follow-up was 79.2% in the intervention group and 84.6% in the control group. Time until full RTW was 102 and 90 days (median) in intervention and control group, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the outcomes.

Despite efforts to increase the number of participants, the study ended up with a small sample. This prohibited us from drawing any final conclusions about the effect of the intervention. Obstacles to recruitment of patients and use of the intervention are discussed.

This study aims to assess the health worker absenteeism and factors associated with it in a high-focus district in Chhattisgarh, India.

Human resources for health are among the key foundations to build resilient healthcare systems. Chhattisgarh is a high-focus Indian state with a severe shortage of health care workers, and absenteeism further aggravates the shortage.

This study was conducted as a mixed-methods study employing sequential explanatory design. Absenteeism was defined as the absence of health worker in the designated position without a formal leave or official reason in two different unannounced visits. A facility survey across all the public healthcare facilities in Jashpur district, Chhattisgarh, was conducted through random, unannounced visits employing a checklist developed based on Indian Public Health Standards. Twelve participants were purposively sampled and interviewed from healthcare facilities to explore factors associated with absenteeism. Survey data were analysed descriptively, and thematic analysis was employed to analyse qualitative interviews.

Among all the positions filled at primary health centre level (n = 339), close to 8% (n = 27) were absent, whereas among the positions filled at community health centre level (n = 285), only 1.14% (n = 4) were absent. Absenteeism was not found in the district hospital. Qualitative interviews reveal that macro-level (geographical location and lack of connectivity), meso-level (lack of equipment and amenities, makeshift health facilities, doctor shortage, and poor patient turnover), and micro-level (unmet expectations) factors contribute to health worker absenteeism.

Health worker absenteeism was more at PHC level. Systemic challenges, human resource shortages, and infrastructural shortcomings contributed to health worker absenteeism.

This scoping review aimed to identify the social prescription activities that exist for the elderly in a community context.

The increase in population ageing imposes the need to implement specific actions that guarantee elderly people the possibility of experiencing this phase with quality. The pandemic significantly exacerbated the needs of the elderly, leading to, regarding the loss of functional capacity, quality of life, well-being, mental health, and increased loneliness. Social prescription emerges as an innovative and non-clinical strategy, being a personalized approach that focuses on individual needs and objectives (Islam, 2020). By referring primary health care users to resources available in the community, obtaining non-medical support that can be used in conjunction with, or instead of, existing medical treatments (Chng et al., 2021).

A scoping review was conducted based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in electronic databases for potential studies: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Studies were included if they: (1) addressed social prescription interventions; (2) were community based; and (3) included elderly participants. Data extraction followed predefined criteria.

Of a total of 865 articles identified, nine were selected. The social prescription activities identified fall into eight main domains: arts, personal development, social interaction, physical activity, gardening, cultural activities, religious activities, and technological activities. The interventions resulted in improved well-being, enhanced quality of life, health promotion, and reduced isolation and loneliness. Social prescription, while innovative, is still an evolving intervention, which can respond to the needs of the elderly population, given the range of activities that may exist in the community. Primary care professionals must develop these interventions, establish a link between health and the community, respond to these needs, and promote healthy ageing.

To characterise the association between risk of poor glycaemic control and self-reported and area-level food insecurity among adult patients with type 2 diabetes.

We performed a retrospective, observational analysis of cross-sectional data routinely collected within a health system. Logistic regressions estimated the association between glycaemic control and the dual effect of self-reported and area-level measures of food insecurity.

The health system included a network of ambulatory primary and speciality care sites and hospitals in Bronx County, NY.

Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who completed a health-related social need (HRSN) assessment between April 2018 and December 2019.

5500 patients with type 2 diabetes were assessed for HRSN with 7·1 % reporting an unmet food need. Patients with self-reported food needs demonstrated higher odds of having poor glycaemic control compared with those without food needs (adjusted OR (aOR): 1·59, 95 % CI: 1·26, 2·00). However, there was no conclusive evidence that area-level food insecurity alone was a significant predictor of glycaemic control (aOR: 1·15, 95 % CI: 0·96, 1·39). Patients with self-reported food needs residing in food-secure (aOR: 1·83, 95 % CI: 1·22, 2·74) and food-insecure (aOR: 1·72, 95 % CI: 1·25, 2·37) areas showed higher odds of poor glycaemic control than those without self-reported food needs residing in food-secure areas.

These findings highlight the importance of utilising patient- and area-level social needs data to identify individuals for targeted interventions with increased risk of adverse health outcomes.

The objective of this study was to explore how selected sub-national (provincial) primary healthcare units in Ethiopia responded to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and what impact these measures had on essential health services.

National-level responses against the spread of COVID-19 and its consequences are well studied. However, data on capacities and challenges of sub-national health systems in mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on essential health services are limited. In countries with decentralized health systems like Ethiopia, a study of COVID-19 impacts on essential health services could inform government bodies, partners, and providers to strengthen the response against the pandemic and document lessons learned.

We conducted a qualitative study, using a descriptive phenomenology research design. A total of 59 health leaders across Ethiopia’s 10 regions and 2 administrative cities were purposively selected to participate in key informant interviews. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide translated into a local language. Interviews were conducted in person or by phone. Coding of transcripts led to the development of categories and themes, which were finalized upon agreement between two investigators. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Essential health services declined in the first months of the pandemic, affecting maternal and child health including deliveries, immunization, family planning services, and chronic disease services. Services declined due to patients’ and providers’ fear of contracting COVID-19, increased cost of transport, and reallocation of financial and human resources to the various activities of the response. Authorities of local governments and the health system responded to the pandemic immediately, capitalizing on multisectoral support and redirecting resources; however, the intensity of the response declined as time progressed. Future investments in health system hardware – health workers, supplies, equipment, and infrastructure as well as carefully designed interventions and coordination are needed to shore up the COVID-19 response.

The prevalence of depression is gradually increasing worldwide with an increasing utilization of antidepressants. Nevertheless, despite their lower costs, generic-brand antidepressants were reported to be less prescribed. We aimed to examine the costs of reference- versus generic-brand antidepressant prescriptions in primary care practice.

This cross-sectional study included electronic prescriptions for adult patients that contained antidepressants (World Health Organization’s Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code: N06A), which were generated by a systematically selected sample of primary care doctors (n = 1431) in Istanbul in 2016. We examined the drug groups preferred, the reference- versus generic-brand status, and pharmacotherapy costs.

The majority of the prescriptions were prescribed for women (71.8%), and the average age of the patients was 53.6 ± 16.2 years. In prescriptions with a depression-related indication (n = 40 497), the mean number and cost of drugs were 1.5 ± 1.0 and 22.7 ± 26.4 United States Dollar ($) per prescription, respectively. In these prescriptions, the mean number and cost of antidepressants per encounter were 1.1 ± 0.2 and $17.0 ± 13.2, respectively. Reference-brand antidepressants were preferred in 58.2% of depression-related prescriptions, where the mean cost per prescription was $18.3 ± 12.4. The mean cost per prescription of the generics, which constituted 41.8% of the antidepressants in prescriptions, was $15.1 ± 11.4. We found that if the generic version with the lowest cost was prescribed instead of the reference-brand, the mean cost per prescription would be $12.9 ± 11.2.

Our study highlighted the substantial pharmacoeconomic impact of generic-brand antidepressant prescribing, whose preference over reference-brands could reduce the cost of antidepressant medication treatment by 17.5% in primary care, which could be approximately doubled if the cheapest generic antidepressant had been prescribed.