To identify types of families, latent-class analysis was applied to
(reported) marriage and (observed) parenting measures obtained during
the infancy, toddler, and/or preschool years for 828 two-parent
families participating in the NICHD Study of Child Care. Five types of
families were identified: Consistently Supportive (i.e., good
parenting, good marriage, 15% of sample), Consistently Moderate (i.e.,
moderate marriage, moderate parenting, 43%), Consistently Risky (i.e.,
poor parenting, poor marriage, 16%), Good Parenting/Poor Marriage
(19%), and Poor Parenting/Good Marriage (7%). When groups were
compared in terms of contextual antecedents (measured at child age 1
month) and child cognitive–academic and socioemotional
functioning in first grade, results indicated (a) that contextual risks
increased linearly and children's functioning decreased linearly
as one moved across the first three aforementioned groups; and after
controlling for group differences in background factors (b) that
children in the Good-Parenting/Poor-Marriage families outperformed
those in the Poor Parenting/Good Marriage; (c) that there was
evidence of “added value” developmentally when children
experienced two sources of support (i.e., good marriage and
good parenting) rather than just one (i.e., good marriage or
good parenting); but (d) that there was only modest evidence of
protective buffering whereby children experiencing just good parenting
(but not just good marriages) outperformed children experiencing poor
parenting and poor marriages. Results are discussed in terms
of the relative influence of marriage and parenting on child
development and the potential benefits of applying typological
approaches to the study of marriage–parenting family
subsystems.The research described herein
was supported by a cooperative agreement with the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development (U10-HD25420). The authors express
their appreciation to all collaborating investigators of the NICHD
Study of Early Child Care.