1. Introduction 310
2. Protein-only hypothesis 312
3. The scrapie prion protein PrPSc313
3.1 Purification of PrP 27–30 313
3.2 Proteinase K resistance 314
3.3 Scrapie-associated fibrils 314
3.4 Smallest infectious unit 316
3.5 Conformational properties 316
3.6 Dissociation and stability 319
4. The cellular prion protein PrPC321
4.1 Prnp expression 321
4.2 Biosynthetic pathway 322
4.3 NMR structures 324
4.4 Copper binding 326
5. Post-translational PrP conversion 327
5.1 Conformational isoforms 327
5.2 Location of propagation 329
5.3 Minimal PrP sequence 330
5.4 Prion species barrier 331
5.5 Prion strains 332
6. Effect of familial TSE mutations 333
6.1 Thermodynamic stability of PrPC 334
6.2 De novo synthesis of PrPSc 335
6.3 Transmembrane PrP forms 337
7. Physical properties of synthetic PrP 337
7.1 Amyloidogenic peptides 337
7.2 Folding intermediates 339
8. Hypothetical protein X 340
8.1 Two species-specific epitopes 340
8.2 Mapping the protein X epitope 341
9. Chaperone-mediated PrP conversion 343
9.1 Hsp60 and Hsp10 chaperonins 343
9.2 GroEL promoted PrP-res formation 345
9.3 Membrane-associated chaperonins 345
9.4 Preference of GroEL for positive charges 347
9.5 Potential GroEL/Hsp60 epitopes on PrP 347
9.6 Conformations of chaperonin-bound PrP 349
9.7 Conserved Hsp60 substrate binding sites 349
9.8 Requirement of ATP-hydrolysis 351
9.9 Hsp60-mediated prion propagation 354
10. Template-assisted annealing model 355
11. Acknowledgments 357
12. References 357
Although the central paradigm of protein folding (Anfinsen, 1973), that the unique three-dimensional structure of a protein is encoded in its amino acid sequence, is well established,
its generality has been questioned due to two recent developments in molecular biology, the
‘prion’ and ‘molecular chaperone’. Biochemical characterization of infectious scrapie
material causing central nervous system (CNS) degeneration indicates that the necessary
component for disease propagation is proteinaceous (Prusiner, 1982), as first outlined by
Griffith (1967) in general terms, and involves a conversion from a cellular prion protein,
denoted PrPC, into a toxic scrapie form, PrPSc,
which is facilitated by PrPSc acting as a template for PrPC
to form new PrPSc molecules (Prusiner, 1987). The ‘protein-only’
hypothesis implies that the same polypeptide sequence, in the absence of any post-translational modifications, can adopt two considerably different stable protein conformations
(Fig. 1). Thus, in the case of prions it is possible, although not proven, that they violate the
central paradigm of protein folding. There is some indirect evidence that another factor,
provisionally named ‘protein X’, might be involved in the conformational conversion
process (Prusiner et al. 1998), which includes a dramatic change from α-helical into β-sheet
secondary structure (Fig. 1). This factor has not been identified yet, but it has been proposed
that protein X may act as a molecular chaperone. The idea that molecular chaperones play a
critical role in the generation of PrPSc is appealing also from a theoretical point of view,
because PrPSc formation involves changes in protein folding and possibly intermolecular
aggregation (Fig. 1), processes in which chaperones are known to participate (Musgrove &
Ellis, 1986). The discovery and functional analysis of more than a dozen molecular chaperones
made it clear that these proteins do not complement folding information that is not already
contained in the genetic code (Ellis et al. 1989); rather they facilitate the folding and assembly
of proteins by preventing misfolding and refolding misfolded proteins (Hartl, 1996). Whether
a molecular chaperone or another type of macromolecule is identified as the conversion
factor, therefore, the molecular chaperone concept is likely to contribute to the understanding
of the molecular nature of PrPC to PrPSc conversion.
In this review I consider the prion concept from the view of a structural biologist whose
main interest focuses on spontaneous and chaperone-mediated conformational changes in
proteins.