We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In order to minimise physical interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, telepsychiatry became a key part of clinical practice for many psychiatrists.
Methods:
This study involved an exploratory, cross-sectional, opt-in online survey circulated to non-consultant doctors in psychiatry working in Ireland. It assessed experience and attitudes in relation to telepsychiatry use.
Discussion:
The response rate was 11.6% (n = 61). Forty-eight individuals (78.6%) had delivered clinical care using telepsychiatry. Fifty-nine individuals (96.7%) were unfamiliar with telepsychiatry prior to the pandemic. Most respondents had not received specific training around use of a telepsychiatry platform (86.9%, n = 63) and were unaware of published guidelines around its optimal use (54.1%, n = 33). Respondents’ concerns included issues around connectivity, medico-legal uncertainty and clinical effectiveness.
Conclusion:
Conclusions drawn are limited by the potential for selection bias in this study. Nonetheless the paper has highlighted important issues including the need for more research assessing telepsychiatry clinical and curricular experience. Additional curricular interventions during training could build skillset and confidence in telepsychiatry.
Major advances over the past decades have transformed the management landscape of neuromuscular disorders. Increased availability of genetic testing, innovative therapies that target specific disease pathways and mechanisms, and a multidisciplinary approach to care including both transitional and palliative care contribute to timely and more appropriate management of conditions that are associated with a severe disease burden and often also a reduction of life expectancy.
There is an increasing number of consensus recommendations/guidelines that are a useful adjunct for establishing a timely and accurate diagnosis, and enable prognostication of disease-related complications, are a guide for multidisciplinary care and treatment, and expedite initiation of disease-modifying interventions. A number of these guidelines have been referred to in various cases, such as myasthenia gravis (MG), myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2, chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies (CIDP), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to name a few.
The global healthcare landscape faces mounting challenges, from resource constraints and rural healthcare access in Uzbekistan, to aging populations and rising chronic disease rates in Europe. Amidst these, the digital transformation in healthcare and the study of international legal aspects governing telemedicine services have emerged as crucial priorities. This article examines the international legal framework for telemedicine, analyzing key documents of the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and various regional bodies. It highlights the absence of a universal agreement that comprehensively addresses telemedicine regulation and data protection issues. The article explores national regulatory efforts and identifies gaps in the current fragmented approach. Recommendations include establishing a dedicated subsidiary body under the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) to oversee telemedicine-related matters and codifying scattered norms into a coherent framework. Strengthening the international legal basis for telemedicine can help expand access to vital healthcare services and improve global health outcomes.
Digital health technologies have been enhancing the capacity of healthcare providers and, thereby, the delivery of targeted health services. The Southeast Asia Region (SEAR) has invested in strengthening digital public health. Many digital health interventions have been implemented in public health settings but are rarely assessed using the holistic health technology assessment (HTA) approach.
Methods
A systematic literature review was performed to provide an overview of evaluations of digital public health interventions in the World Health Organization (WHO) SEAR. Searches were conducted on four electronic databases. Screening title abstracts and full texts was independently conducted by two reviewers, followed by data extraction. Dimensions of HTA were analyzed against the EUnetHTA Core Model 3.0. Quality assessment of included articles was conducted using the JBI Checklist for Economic Evaluation and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist to assess the reporting quality. The findings are presented using systematic evidence tables and bar charts.
Results
Of the forty-three studies screened at the full-text stage, thirteen studies conducted across six countries were included in the analysis. Telemedicine and m-health interventions were assessed in ten studies. Nine studies conducted cost-effectiveness analysis, and five assessments were conducted from a societal perspective. Four studies utilized more than one perspective for the assessment. Health problem definition and current use of technology, description and technical characteristics of the technology, clinical effectiveness, costs, economic evaluation, and organizational aspects were assessed by all the studies, whereas legal aspects were least assessed.
Conclusion
The lack of HTAs on digital public health interventions in the region highlights the need for capacity-building efforts.
Private equity (PE) firms play an increasingly important role in healthcare. Yet, existing research remains uneven, mostly focused on the United States and on certain sectors such as nursing homes. Some geographical areas and health specialties remain under-explored. This brief paper outlines a research agenda focusing on three key issues: (1) PE's significance and (2) business strategies in healthcare, and (3) PE's impacts on health and healthcare. The paper uses primary care in Ireland as an example. The proposed research agenda should improve our understanding of the nature of PE in healthcare and serve as a basis for policy-makers to explore appropriate and effective regulation of PE to reduce its negative impacts if and when they exist.
In recent years, the importance of telemedicine has increased significantly. Especially in the field of echocardiography, virtual reality glasses offer the possibility of real-time data transmission without restrictions in the examination process. In particular, the care of critically ill newborns with suspected CHD might be improved by allowing a specialized paediatric cardiologist to remotely guide an echocardiographic examination. The current study aims to prove whether novices, under Google Glass guidance by a paediatric cardiologist, can perform an appropriate neonatal echocardiography.
Methods:
The current study is a prospective monocentric single-blinded pilot study. Participants were supposed to perform two test runs: The first test run was “unguided” and the second test run was instructed via Google Glass. A validated training simulator for neonatal echocardiography “EchocomNeo, Echocom GmbH” was used. The study took place at the Leipzig Heart Center, Department of Pediatric Cardiology from April 2022 to November 2022.
Results:
A total of 21 medical students were enrolled. In total 252 views (126 views in each test run) were recorded. The overall performance was significantly higher in the Google Glass guided test run compared to “unguided” (structure score: 77.6% vs. 63.2%. p < 0.001 and quality score: 58.7% vs. 47.2%, p < 0.001). Also, the time was significantly lower in the Google Glass guided test run than in the unguided test run, p = 0.014.
Conclusion:
Google Glass guidance by a paediatric cardiologist could optimize the performance of novices in echocardiography using a standardized neonatal echo-simulator with structural normal cardiac anatomy.
Since COVID-19, Indonesia has legalized telemedicine in medical services, including Return to Work (RTW). RTW programs help occupational injury-disabled workers return to work. This research examines how telemedicine supports RTW for employees with occupational injuries.
Methods
The study used Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA) to find patterns and trends in RTW program telemedicine case numbers and claim settlements over time. A total of 1 314 data were obtained from the Indonesian National Social Security Agency on Employment (BPJS Ketenagakerjaan) from July 1, 2015, to December 2022.
Results
Telemedicine reduces the frequency of recurrent occupational injuries in persons with impairments (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.59). In addition, the integration of telemedicine into health care practices exhibits promising prospects in terms of mitigating the financial burden on social security programs. This is supported by a robust RR (0.6).
Conclusions
Telemedicine reduced the number of repeat cases and optimized medical claims cost in the RTW program during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results will contribute to policy and assist health care professionals and employers in improving RTW outcomes for disabled people.
In a prospective, remote natural history study of 277 individuals with (60) and genetically at risk for (217) Parkinson’s disease (PD), we examined interest in the return of individual research results (IRRs) and compared characteristics of those who opted for versus against the return of IRRs. Most (n = 180, 65%) requested sharing of IRRs with either a primary care provider, neurologist, or themselves. Among individuals without PD, those who requested sharing of IRRs with a clinician reported more motor symptoms than those who did not request any sharing (mean (SD) 2.2 (4.0) versus 0.7 (1.5)). Participant interest in the return of IRRs is strong.
Technology and telemedicine are needed to provide the necessary solutions for public health in rural areas. Lack of stable internet access and digital literacy hinders the effective use of telemedicine. Governments and service providers can work together to extend coverage, increase internet speed in rural areas, and provide training and education to ensure adequate digital literacy.
This contribution analyzes the impact of digital health care on the European Union (EU) legislative framework concerning cross-border health care and the related reimbursement rules. Traditionally, cross-border health care concerns a situation where a patient crosses an internal EU border. However, with the introduction of digital health care, a patient is no longer required to move to receive cross-border health care. Under EU law, patients have two independent rights to reimbursement for medical expenses in a cross-border situation, embedded in Regulation 833/2004 on Social Security Systems and the Patients’ Rights Directive 2011/24. A striking difference between the Regulation and the Directive lies in the fact that the Directive explicitly addresses digital health care, referring to “telemedicine,” whereas the Regulation does not. Also, whereas under the Directive, cross-border health care is reimbursed at the home-state rate, under the Regulation, cross-border health care is reimbursed at the host-state rate, leaving room for forum shopping for advantageous reimbursement rates. However, as the Regulation refers to “travel” and “temporary residence” in the host state, such forum shopping would not be available for digital cross-border health care. This contribution focusses on these discrepancies between the Directive and the Regulation, and specifically on the consequences for the reimbursement of patients benefitting from cross-border digital health care. Digital and physical cross-border health care reimbursement opportunities are compared, and based on the outcomes, an assessment is made as to whether the Regulation should be updated to be suitable for digital health care.
Impaired motor and cognitive function can make travel cumbersome for People with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Over 50% of PwPD cared for at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Movement Disorders Clinic reside over 30 miles from Little Rock. Improving access to clinical care for PwPD is needed.
Objective:
To explore the feasibility of remote clinic-to-clinic telehealth research visits for evaluation of multi-modal function in PwPD.
Methods:
PwPD residing within 30 miles of a UAMS Regional health center were enrolled and clinic-to-clinic telehealth visits were performed. Motor and non-motor disease assessments were administered and quantified. Results were compared to participants who performed at-home telehealth visits using the same protocols during the height of the COVID pandemic.
Results:
Compared to the at-home telehealth visit group (n = 50), the participants from regional centers (n = 13) had similar age and disease duration, but greater disease severity with higher total Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale scores (Z = −2.218, p = 0.027) and lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (Z = −3.350, p < 0.001). Regional center participants had lower incomes (Pearson’s chi = 21.3, p < 0.001), higher costs to attend visits (Pearson’s chi = 16.1, p = 0.003), and lived in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods (Z = −3.120, p = 0.002). Prior research participation was lower in the regional center group (Pearson’s chi = 4.5, p = 0.034) but both groups indicated interest in future research participation.
Conclusions:
Regional center research visits in PwPD in medically underserved areas are feasible and could help improve access to care and research participation in these traditionally underrepresented populations.
Constant pivoting by clinical teams and leadership was required to provide quality care during the COVID-19 pandemic. We share the roadmap used by Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, an academic tertiary care facility in the East Village of Manhattan, which is part of the Mount Sinai Health System. Lessons learned are discussed in the response of this care facility to the overwhelming influx of patients. New York City became the epicenter of COVID-19 in the United States and the disease quickly overwhelmed one of the largest cities in the world, resulting in historical shut downs that impacted the infrastructure of the city. Clinical leaders needed to act quickly in order to prepare the facility for the surge of patients, which required the creation of more than double the normal capacity of medical/surgical beds and a tripling of the number of intensive care unit beds, which resulted in a tremendous need for supplies and equipment, especially ventilators. This chapter allows readers to follow the facility as the pandemic unfolded, showing the clinical challenges that were faced as information developed and guidance changed daily regarding best practices and methods to treat patients, protect staff, and stop the spread of the virus.
This introductory chapter sets out the need for a handbook of university mental health. It considers the health of staff alongside that of students, and that does not presume American systems of education and healthcare. Far more of the UK population expects to attend university, with a consequent expansion in the size and numbers of institutions. Financial constraints mean that universities can no longer run as elite communities of self-governing scholars, but are now governed according to business models, with implications for the wellbeing of all involved. In the context of population-wide increases in mental disorder and demand for treatment, more students than ever now disclose a psychiatric diagnosis. The recent COVID pandemic and lockdown disproportionately threatened the well-being of students and may have changed for good some of the ways in which education and healthcare are delivered. The author summarises her own personal and professional of UK university life and describes the motivation for embarking on the production of a single author handbook on this topic. A wide readership is welcomed to the book, which will provide a series of interlinked but standalone chapters to be consulted piecemeal as well as read as a whole.
Three groups of severe mental illness have disproportionately high rates of suicide – Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and anorexia nervosa – but effective treatment can save lives. Despite more positive conversations about mental health, we often avoid the very mention of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. It is impossible and unsafe to support a seriously mentally ill person unaided. Clinicians and lay carers need to be part of a mutually supportive network. Integrating care involves a series of permissions - preferably arranged in advance – to communicate with confidentiality, privacy and dignity. Effective treatment of acute psychoses involves thoughtful prescribing and monitoring of medication. It is understandable to feel angry and sad about having an illness that interrupts life and education. There are effective treatments even for the most severe mental illnesses that affect young students. However, it takes far longer to see recovery than with most physical conditions. Policies on admissions, fitness to study and time taken out of studies need to take account of this. Students usually need care to be transferred to the location of the family home and later back again. NHS teams may be able to use telemedicine to communicate with a distant University.
Edited by
Andrea Fiorillo, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples,Peter Falkai, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Philip Gorwood, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris
Advances in technology have virtually transformed communication and interaction modalities. Telemental health provides the advantages to reach those patients who may otherwise have limited mental health care delivery due to the lack of specialty professionals, limited financial resources to face costs and lost wages for travel to distant clinics, or go without services altogether. Remote technologies, including telemental health and telepsychiatry, broadly became a cost-effective and complementary tool to overcome restricted clinical practices, safely engage, and manage patients suffering with mental disorders who need care, support, and treatment. Although most research to date has demonstrated adequate comparability to traditional in-person modalities to deliver mental health care, there remain some concerns among professionals regarding the implementation of telemental health and telepsychiatry in routine clinical practice, as there may be a set of technological and logistic barriers as well as safety, privacy, and confidentiality issues to be addressed.
Telemedicine enables critical human communication and interaction between researchers and participants in decentralized research studies. There is a need to better understand the overall scope of telemedicine applications in clinical research as the basis for further research. This narrative, nonsystematic review of the literature sought to review and discuss applications of telemedicine, in the form of synchronous videoconferencing, in clinical research. We searched PubMed to identify relevant literature published between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2023. Two independent screeners assessed titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by single-reviewer full-text screening, and we organized the literature into core themes through consensus discussion. We screened 1044 publications for inclusion. Forty-eight publications met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified six core themes to serve as the structure for the narrative review: infrastructure and training, recruitment, informed consent, assessment, monitoring, and engagement. Telemedicine applications span all stages of clinical research from initial planning and recruitment to informed consent and data collection. While the evidence base for using telemedicine in clinical research is not well-developed, existing evidence suggests that telemedicine is a potentially powerful tool in clinical research.
This study analyses outcomes for 660 patients managed via a novel telescopic pathway for suspected head and neck cancer referrals.
Method
Data were collected prospectively between January 2021 and December 2022, capturing all two-week-wait referrals triaged as low risk and managed via a nurse-led clinic for nasendoscopic examination and consultant-led remote assessment.
Results
In total, 660 patients were included. There were six head and neck cancers diagnosed, giving a conversion rate of 0.9 per cent. Mean (standard deviation) time to informing the patient whether they did or did not have cancer (28-day faster diagnosis standard) was 28.6 days (20.2), with no significant difference observed in patients imaged prior to review (p = 0.63). No missed cancers were detected in the follow-up period.
Conclusion
Low-risk head and neck cancer referrals can be safely managed in a nurse-led clinic for recorded examination with asynchronous consultant-led management. Further work is required to ensure adherence to the new faster diagnosis standard.
Telemedicine may improve healthcare access and efficiency if it demands less clinician time than usual care. We sought to describe the degree to which telemedicine trials assess the effect of telemedicine on clinicians’ time and to discuss how including the time needed to treat (TNT) in health technology assessment (HTA) could affect the design of telemedicine services and studies.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review by searching clinicaltrials.gov using the search term “telemedicine” and limiting results to randomized trials or observational studies registered between January 2012 and October 2023. We then reviewed trial registration data to determine if any of the outcomes assessed in the trials measured effect on clinicians’ time.
Results
We found 113 studies and of these 78 studies of telemedicine met the inclusion criteria and were included. Nine (12 percent) of the 78 studies had some measure of clinician time as a primary outcome, and 11 (14 percent) as a secondary outcome. Four studies compared direct measures of TNT with telemedicine versus usual care, but no statistically significant difference was found. Of the sixteen studies including indirect measures of clinician time, thirteen found no significant effects, two found a statistically significant reduction, and one found a statistically significant increase.
Conclusions
This scoping review found that clinician time is not commonly measured in studies of telemedicine interventions. Attention to telemedicine’s TNT in clinical studies and HTAs of telemedicine in practice may bring attention to the organization of clinical workflows and increase the value of telemedicine.
In many domains of life, COVID-19 has reshaped our understandings of the home as a space of work, education and care. This chapter explores the home as a site of abortion care, after the “home” was approved in countries worldwide as a place where doctors could virtually prescribe, and people could take abortion pills. The chapter explores different visions of abortion-at-home in the COVID-19 regulatory reforms, and different experiences and understandings of that care. Part I tracks the constructions of the home within a crisis management discourse, as favored in state justifications for the reforms. Motivated by a historic state of emergency, a temporary response to ensure access to care and to limit exposure to the virus, these reforms are characterized as pragmatic and conservative by enabling clinicians to safely administer an abortion with the same control brought into the home. Part II proposes an alternative legacy of the reforms by focusing on the agency of people in transforming their homes into places of care. While introduced of necessity, the home becomes a site of experimentation and improvisation informed by a home aesthetic unbounded by the regulated structures of medical care. Intersecting with the everyday tasks, products and people of home life, abortion care is opened to all forms of radical diversity, especially during a time when people are forming new relationships to their home and investing new meaning in it. The chapter concludes by imagining the future of abortion law born of public health need but habituated in the home.