No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The dubious precision and utility of heritability estimates
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2022
Abstract
Uchiyama et al. question heritability estimates in a convincing manner. We offer additional arguments to further bolster their claims, highlighting methodological issues in heritability coefficients' derivation, their misuse in various contexts, and their potential contributions to exacerbating common erroneous intuitions that have been shown to lead to deleterious social phenomena. We conclude that science should move away from using them.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Causadias, J. M., Vitriol, J. A., & Atkin, A. L. (2018). Do we overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities? Evidence of a cultural (mis)attribution bias in American psychology. American Psychologist, 73, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011a). Some thoughts on essence placeholders, interactionism, and heritability: Reply to Haslam (2011) and Turkheimer (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011b). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dar-Nimrod, I., Kuntzman, R., MacNevin, G., Lynch, K., Woods, M., & Morandini, J. (2021). Genetic essentialism: The mediating role of essentialist biases on the relationship between genetic knowledge and the interpretations of genetic information. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 64, 104119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derringer, J., Krueger, R. F., Dick, D. M., Saccone, S., Grucza, R. A., Agrawal, A., … Gene Environment Association Studies (GENEVA) Consortium (2010). Predicting sensation seeking from dopamine genes: A candidate-system approach. Psychological Science, 21, 1282–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J. (2017). DNA is not destiny: The remarkable, completely misunderstood relationship between you and your genes. Norton.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Dar-Nimrod, I., Cheung, B. Y., & Proulx, T. (2017). Essentially biased: Why people are fatalistic about genes. In Olson, J. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 137–192). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In Semin, G. & Fiedler, K. (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). Sage.Google Scholar
Roy, M., Neale, M. C., & Kendler, K. S. (1995). The genetic epidemiology of self-esteem. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 813–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schunkert, H., Konig, I. R., Kathiresan, S., Reilly, M. P., Assimes, T. L., Holm, H., … Samani, N. J. (2011). Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nature Genetics, 43, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, N. R., & Gottesman, I. I. (2012). Using summary data from the Danish national twin registers to estimate heritabilities for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Cultural evolution of genetic heritability
Related commentaries (29)
(Super-)cultural clustering explains gender differences too
A cultural evolutionary behavior genetics will need a more sophisticated conceptualization of cultural traits
Changes in heritability: Unpredictable and of limited use
Cultural dynamics add multiple layers of complexity to behavioural genetics
Cultural evolution and behavior genetic modeling: The long view of time
Cultural evolution may influence heritability by shaping assortative mating
Cultural evolution: The third component of mental illness heritability
Cultural evolutionary theory is not enough: Ambiguous culture, neglect of structure, and the absence of theory in behavior genetics
Culture and causal inference: The impact of cultural differences on the generalisability of findings from Mendelian randomisation studies
Culture is reducing genetic heritability and superseding genetic adaptation
Developmental noise is an overlooked contributor to innate variation in psychological traits
Differential application of cultural practices at the family and individual levels may alter heritability estimates
Evolving the blank slate
From the trajectory of heritability to the heritability of trajectories
Genetic solutions to cultural problems?
Going beyond heritability: Mechanisms of gene–culture coevolution
Heritability is a poor, if not unhelpful, measure of complex human behavioral processes
Hidden clusters beyond ethnic boundaries
Interpreting and reinterpreting heritability estimates in educational behavior genetics
Measuring heritability: Why bother?
Models of gene–culture evolution are incomplete without incorporating epigenetic effects
The dubious precision and utility of heritability estimates
The evolutionary dance between culture, genes, and everything in between
The implications of the cultural evolution of heritability for evolutionary psychology
The many geographical layers of culture
There is no such thing as culture-free intelligence
This time I mean it: The nature–nurture debate is over
Understanding cultural clusters: An ethnographic perspective
Unpackaging cultural variability in behavioral phenotypes
Author response
Integrating cultural evolution and behavioral genetics