This chapter looks at the most recent climate science and starkly sets out the severity of the problems ahead. It gives the reader all the knowledge needed to broadly understand the critical issues of our day from a technical perspective, including systems of production and consumption for energy and food, biodiversity loss, pollution (including plastics), disease threats and population levels. It then looks at ways in which we can technically transfer to a sustainable way of living.

Module 6 presents various ways in which cultures understand, describe, and explain illness. These conceptualizations are based in cultural ontologies and epistemologies, affecting how people communicate about illnesses and their expectations for treatment and outcomes. Indigenous and shamanic traditions are presented.

Provides a brief introduction to bacterial disease highlighting capsules and biofilms.

This chapter charts the processes by which deceptive sex came to be regarded as potentially constituting rape. Through tracing these developments, the chapter shows how doctrinal features of the law, such as the way consent and deception are thought to be related and the modes of deception punished by law, were important to this process. Yet the chapter also argues that to fully appreciate how and why the changes occurred, it is necessary to pay attention to the array of interests the law has sought to protect and how these have shaped the range of topics of deception that might ground a charge of rape. This argument leads to the conclusion that, in the context of deceptive sex, deception has not been considered wrongful because it invalidates or precludes consent, as is commonly thought; rather, deception has invalidated or precluded consent because it has sometimes been considered wrongful. The chapter ends by introducing some reasons why this insight is important to ongoing debates regarding the criminalisation of deceptive sex.

This chapter examines the law of nullity of marriage to consider how deception has affected the existence or validity of consent. It articulates important differences between void and voidable marriages, arguing that these speak to the public and private sides of marriage, respectively. It also showcases the range of deceptions that have been considered legally significant, situating these within the cultural framework outlined in Chapter 1. On top of this, the chapter argues that the range of qualifying deceptions has often been justified with reference to public policy or convention on the basis that the relevant information would typically be important to an intimate partner or that its disclosure would serve a collective interest or value. The chapter concludes by suggesting that changes in the law of nullity, and a small number of related areas of law, demonstrate that there is still a desire for legal recognition of the wrongs and harms associated with inducing intimate relationships, even as these have shifted over time.

This chapter examines the action of breach of promise of marriage to show its relationships with deception. It outlines how a broken promise of marriage, which could always imply deception regarding intention to keep the promise, attracted damages and highlights how known deception constituted an aggravation. The chapter also demonstrates how deception about certain features of oneself or one’s circumstances could justify a fiancé(e)’s decision to break a promise of marriage. Beyond these points, the chapter shows how conventions about relationships shaped the processes by which promises of marriage could be inferred or imputed, and it explores the links between actions of breach of promise of marriage and changing expectations of marriage, including the expectation that it should be based on real love. Through this process, the chapter offers an original argument about the decline of breach of promise at marriage which reveals its changing relationship to deception. The chapter concludes with some reflections on what actions of breach of promise suggest about the capacity of law to regulate promises and statements of future intention, as they relate to intimacy, in a contemporary context.

This chapter summarises the overarching narrative of this book and argues that as was as being intrinsically valuable it can inform contemporary debates about using law to regulate the practices of inducing intimacy. The discussion is organised around three sets of issues: the public and private dimensions of sex and intimate relationships, including the interests protected by law, the form of response (i.e., state or non-state), and the variety of legal response (i.e., public or private); the structure of legal responses, the meaning of consent and its relation to deception, targeted modes of deception, culpability matters, the requirement for a causal link between deception and ‘outcome’, and the temporalities of the legal wrong; and the substance of deceptions, including the dynamics governing the range of topics about which transparency has been expected. Drawing the discussion together, the chapter concludes by offering a new framework for constructing legal responses to deceptively induced intimacy, which builds on the core insight and these responses have historically been predicated on temporally sensitive associations between self-construction and intimacy.

Anthropologist Richard Leakey sent Jane Goodall to Gombe (now Gombe Stream National Park) to study chimpanzees in the wild. As an anthropologist, he was keenly interested in human behavior, and believed that chimpanzees would provide a window to understanding it. It took Goodall six months of crawling around in the woods before any chimpanzees would allow her to get close enough to observe them. But her persistence paid off, as she was able to document chimpanzees showing some very human behavior including tool making, cooperative hunting and war making. Partway through her career, she elected to devote the rest of her career to environmental activism and education, and Gombe research was continued by a growing community of researchers including her student, Anne Pusey. Pusey was fascinated by mother–infant relationships, by developmental changes in juveniles as they matured, and by how chimpanzees manage to avoid breeding with close relatives. Other researchers at Gombe studied the relationship between rank and reproductive success, and how disease was influencing survival rates in three different populations in the region. Unfortunately, life table studies indicate that disease and a lack of immigrants into the region are threatening the viability of this iconic group of chimpanzees.

Exploitative interactions can be understood in terms of their lethality and intimacy. Predators and parasitoids cause highest lethality, parasites and parasitoids have highest intimacy with their hosts, while grazers are low on both scales. Exploiters can regulate the populations of their hosts directly by killing or injuring them, or through nonconsumptive processes such as increasing their prey’s stress level and thereby reducing reproductive rates, as has been implicated for the snowshoe hare. Exploiters can also regulate community processes indirectly; for example bats and birds eat arthropods in the forest, which reduces leaf damage by herbivorous arthropods. Prey and hosts use constitutive defenses, such as thorns in plants, and large body size in Serengeti grazers, against exploiters. Some species have evolved induced defenses; for example some plants release toxic chemicals following herbivore attack. The outcomes of exploitative interactions can be predicted by the Lotka–Volterra predation model, which, in its most basic form, predicts that the relative abundance of predators and prey will cycle. A simple model of disease transmission can explain how disease spreads in host populations based on the ease of transmission, the amount of time the host is infectious, and the population size of the host. Both models make numerous simplifying assumptions. Ecologists can incorporate biological complexity into these models, which makes them more realistic, but also more difficult to understand and apply.

The goal of Chapter 5 is to examine emoji use across the healthcare landscape, as well as what implications related to emoji theories can be gleaned from such usage and how emoji use can be applied to training healthcare professionals more generally. Prominently discussed in the chapter are clinical studies that indicate emoji writing (between practitioners and patients) may actually enhance medical outcomes. Also highlighted is the empirically attested fact that emoji scales and models may be good gauges for assessing well-being. The overall conclusion that can be drawn from the studies is that emoji might affect patients positively. Emoji are not medical cures in themselves, needless to say; they are simple pictures that affect patients positively, much like humor. They may also counteract the so-called nocebo effect, defined as a detrimental effect on health produced by psychological or psychosomatic factors such as negative expectations of treatment or prognosis.

Amidst all of the ills that struck Antioch in the sixth century, the bubonic plague ranks high. This chapter addresses the actual entity of the pestilence, calling into question the reports in the ancient sources.

This chapter presents a new, annotated translation of the famous treatise Airs, Waters, and Places (c. late 5th century BC), attributed, perhaps incorrectly, to the medical writer Hippokrates of Kos. The treatise sets out a model of how environment and seasonal conditions promote specific physiological conditions in the human body, and assesses the relationship between nature and custom as determinants of the physiology, ethical character, and social organization of Asian peoples, focusing on a comparison between European and Asian Skythians. A final passage identifies the greater variability among Europeans. The chapter introduction suggests a nuanced view of the controversial closing pages of the work: the author does not consistently regard Europeans as superior, but–perhaps under the influence of Athenian power–emphasizes the importance of understanding political systems.