No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2013
There are several facets of second-person neuroscience which can benefit from comparisons with animal behavioral neuroscience studies. This commentary addresses the challenges involved in obtaining quantitative data from second-person techniques, the role of stress in inducing robust responses, the use of interactive functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and the value of applying interactive methods to studies of aggression and depression.
Target article
Toward a second-person neuroscience1
Related commentaries (28)
A mature second-person neuroscience needs a first-person (plural) developmental foundation
A second-person approach cannot explain intentionality in social understanding
Advancing the neuroscience of social emotions with social immersion
Brain games: Toward a neuroecology of social behavior
From synthetic modeling of social interaction to dynamic theories of brain–body–environment–body–brain systems
From the bottom up: The roots of social neuroscience at risk of running dry?
Further steps toward a second-person neuroscience
Interaction versus observation: A finer look at this distinction and its importance to autism
It takes two to talk: A second-person neuroscience approach to language learning
Merging second-person and first-person neuroscience
Mirror neurons are central for a second-person neuroscience: Insights from developmental studies
On projecting grammatical persons into social neurocognition: A view from linguistics
Parameterising ecological validity and integrating individual differences within second-person neuroscience
Reciprocity between second-person neuroscience and cognitive robotics
Second person neuroscience needs theories as well as methods
Second-person neuroscience: Implications for Wittgensteinian and Vygotskyan approaches to psychology
Second-person social neuroscience: Connections to past and future theories, methods, and findings
Social affordances in context: What is it that we are bodily responsive to?
Social affordances: Is the mirror neuron system involved?
Social cognition is not a special case, and the dark matter is more extensive than recognized
Social perception and “spectator theories” of other minds
Talking to each other and talking together: Joint language tasks and degrees of interactivity
The brain as part of an enactive system
The second person in “I”-“you”-“it” triadic interactions
The use of non-interactive scenarios in social neuroscience
Toward a neuroscience of interactive parent–infant dyad empathy
What we can learn from second animal neuroscience
Why not the first-person plural in social cognition?
Author response
A second-person neuroscience in interaction1