Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:27:35.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction versus observation: A finer look at this distinction and its importance to autism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2013

Elizabeth Redcay ,
Katherine Rice  and
Rebecca Saxe
Elizabeth Redcay
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. redcay@umd.edukrice@umd.eduwww.dscn.umd.edu
Katherine Rice
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. redcay@umd.edukrice@umd.eduwww.dscn.umd.edu
Rebecca Saxe
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139. saxe@mit.eduwww.saxelab.mit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although a second-person neuroscience has high ecological validity, the extent to which a second- versus third-person neuroscience approach fundamentally alters neural patterns of activation requires more careful investigation. Nonetheless, we are hopeful that this new avenue will prove fruitful in significantly advancing our understanding of typical and atypical social cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charman, T. (2003) Why is joint attention a pivotal skill in autism? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 358(1430):315–24.Google Scholar
Dufour, N., Redcay, E., Young, L., Mavros, P. L., Moran, J. M., Triantafyllou, C. & Saxe, R. (2012) What explains variability in brain regions associated with theory of mind in a large sample of neurotypical adults and adults with ASD? In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Miyake, N., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R. P., pp. 312–17. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. (2003) Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short- term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100(15):9096–101.Google Scholar
Mundy, P. & Newell, L. (2007) Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(5):269–74. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x.Google Scholar
Murray, L. & Trevarthen, C. (1985) Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In: Social perception in infants, ed. Field, T. M. & Fox, N. A., pp. 177–97. Ablex.Google Scholar
Nation, K. & Penny, S. (2008) Sensitivity to eye gaze in autism: Is it normal? Is it automatic? Is it social? Development and Psychopathology 20(1):79–97.Google Scholar
Pelphrey, K. A., Morris, J. P. & McCarthy, G. (2004) Grasping the intentions of others: The perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10):1706–16.Google Scholar
Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Pearrow, M. J., Triantafyllou, C., Gabrieli, J. D. & Saxe, R. (2012) Atypical brain activation patterns during a face-to-face joint attention game in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Human Brain Mapping. doi:10.1002/hbm.22086. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
Redcay, E., Dodell-Feder, D., Pearrow, M. J., Mavros, P. L., Kleiner, M., Gabrieli, J. D. & Saxe, R. (2010) Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage 50(4):1639–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.052.Google Scholar
Redcay, E., O'Young, D., Slevc, L. R., Mavros, P. L., Gabrieli, J. D. E. & Sinha, P. (2012) Gaze cues in complex, real-world scenes direct the attention of high-functioning adults with autism. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Miyake, N., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R. P., pp. 911–16. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Saxe, R., Xiao, D., Kovacs, G., Perrett, D. I. & Kanwisher, N. (2004) A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia 42(11):1435–46.Google Scholar
Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N. C., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R. & Vogeley, K. (2006) Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 44(5):718–30. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017.Google Scholar
Senju, A., Southgate, V., White, S. & Frith, U. (2009) Mindblind eyes: An absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science 325(5942):883–85. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1176170.Google Scholar