Article contents
Quantifying resilience: Theoretical or pragmatic for translational research?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2015
Abstract
Quantifying resilience allows for several testable hypotheses, such as that resilience is equal to the number of mental health problems given a known quantity of stressor load. The proposed model lends itself well to prospective studies with data collection pre- and post-adversity; however, prestressor assessments are not always available. Challenges remain for adapting quantifying resilience to animal research, even if the idea of its translation value is significant.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Admon, R., Milad, M. R. & Hendler, T. (2013) A causal model of post-traumatic stress disorder: Disentangling predisposed from acquired neural abnormalities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
17(7):337–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binder, E. B., Bradley, R. G., Liu, W., Epstein, M. P., Deveau, T. C., Mercer, K. B., Tang, Y., Gillespie, C. F., Heim, C. M., Nemeroff, C. B., Schwartz, A. C., Cubells, J. F. & Ressler, K. J. (2008) Association of FKBP5 polymorphisms and childhood abuse with risk of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults. Journal of the American Medical Association
299(11):1291–305. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremner, J. D., Southwick, S. M., Darnell, A. & Charney, D. S. (1996) Chronic PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans: Course of illness and substance abuse. American Journal of Psychiatry
153:369–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014a) The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry
13(1):28–35. doi: 10.1002/wps.20087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elhai, J. D., Gray, M. J., Kashdan, T. B. & Franklin, C. L. (2005) Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects? A survey of traumatic stress professionals. Journal of Traumatic Stress
18(5):541–45. doi: 10.1002/jts.20062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R. & Hirsch, J. (2006) Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron
51(6):871–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Etkin, A. & Wager, T. (2007) Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: A meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. American Journal of Psychiatry
164(10):1476–88. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07030504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feder, A., Ahmad, S., Lee, E. J., Morgan, J. E., Singh, R., Smith, B. W., Southwick, S. M. & Charney, D. S. (2013) Coping and PTSD symptoms in Pakistani earthquake survivors: Purpose in life, religious coping and social support. Journal of Affective Disorders
147(1–3):156–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, E. M., Jovanovic, T., Mercer, K. B., Kerley, K., Bradley, B., Ressler, K. J. & Norrholm, S. D. (2012) Estrogen levels are associated with extinction deficits in women with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry
72(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.02.031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C. & Wang, P. (2010) Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry
167(7):748–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milad, M. R., Pitman, R. K., Ellis, C. B., Gold, A. L., Shin, L. M., Lasko, N.. B., Zeidan, M. A., Handwerger, K., Orr, S. P. & Rauch, S. L. (2009) Neurobiological basis of failure to recall extinction memory in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry
66(12):1075–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, C. A., III., Wang, S., Southwick, S. M., Rasmusson, A., Hazlett, G., Hauger, R. L. & Charney, D. S. (2000) Plasma neuropeptide-Y concentrations in humans exposed to military survival training. Biological Psychiatry
47(10):902–909. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00239-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norrholm, S. D., Jovanovic, T., Smith, A., Binder, E. B., Klengel, T., Conneely, K., Mercer, K. B., Davis, J. S., Kerley, K., Winkler, J., Gillespie, C. F., Bradley, B. & Ressler, K. J. (2013) Differential genetic and epigenetic regulation of catechol-O-methyl-transferase is associated with impaired fear inhibition in posttraumatic stress disorder. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
7:30. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, S. L., Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Macklin, M. L., Lasko, N. B., Orr, S. P. & Pitman, R. K. (2000) Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: A functional MRI study. Biological Psychiatry
47(9):769–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reul, J. M. (2014) Making memories of stressful events: A journey along epigenetic, gene transcription, and signaling pathways. Frontiers in Psychiatry
5:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 2
- Cited by
Target article
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Related commentaries (35)
Adding network approaches to a neurobiological framework of resilience
Animals can tell us more
Appreciating methodological complexity and integrating neurobiological perspectives to advance the science of resilience
Are positive appraisals always adaptive?
Beyond resilience: Positive mental health and the nature of cognitive processes involved in positive appraisals
Broadening the definition of resilience and “reappraising” the use of appetitive motivation
Careful operationalization and assessment are critical for advancing the study of the neurobiology of resilience1
Cognitive trade-offs and the costs of resilience
Do we know how stressed we are?
Does a positive appraisal style work in all stressful situations and for all individuals?
Heterogeneity of cognitive-neurobiological determinants of resilience
Integration of negative experiences: A neuropsychological framework for human resilience
Knowledge and resilience
Personality science, resilience, and posttraumatic growth
Phenotypic programming as a distal cause of resilience
Positive appraisal style: The mental immune system?1
Quantifying resilience: Theoretical or pragmatic for translational research?
Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered
Rediscovering confidence as a mechanism and optimism as a construct
Resilience and psychiatric epidemiology: Implications for a conceptual framework
Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive
Resilience: Mediated by not one but many appraisal mechanisms
Resilience: The role of accurate appraisal, thresholds, and socioenvironmental factors1
Rethinking reappraisal: Insights from affective neuroscience
Social ecological complexity and resilience processes
Stability through variability: Homeostatic plasticity and psychological resilience
The challenges of forecasting resilience
The importance of not only individual, but also community and society factors in resilience in later life
The self in its social context: Why resilience needs company
The temporal dynamics of resilience: Neural recovery as a biomarker
The value of “negative” appraisals for resilience. Is positive (re)appraisal always good and negative always bad?
Toward a translational neuropsychiatry of resilience
What do we know about positive appraisals? Low cognitive cost, orbitofrontal-striatal connectivity, and only short-term bolstering of resilience
When at rest: “Event-free” active inference may give rise to implicit self-models of coping potential
“If you want to understand something, try to change it”: Social-psychological interventions to cultivate resilience
Author response
Advancing empirical resilience research