No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Phenotypic programming as a distal cause of resilience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2015
Abstract
During early childhood, individuals with high sensitivity to early programming adjust their phenotype in a way that is expected to be adaptive in their later environment. These adaptations are hypothesized to result in resilience in environments that match the early environment. As appraisal style is a putative target of adaptive programming, early experiences could be a distal cause of resilience.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Andersen, S. L. (2003) Trajectories of brain development: Point of vulnerability or window of opportunity?
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
27(1–2):3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00005-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007) For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science
16(6):300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggio, F., Pisu, M. G., Garau, A., Boero, G., Locci, V., Mostallino, M. C., Olla, P., Utzeri, C. & Serra, M. (2014) Maternal separation attenuates the effect of adolescent social isolation on HPA axis responsiveness in adult rats. European Neuropsychopharmacology
24(7):1152–61. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.03.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, W. T. & Ellis, B. J. (2005) Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology
17(2):271–301. doi: 10.1017/S0954579405050145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, G. H., Yu, T., Chen, E., Miller, G. E., Kogan, S. M. & Beach, S. R. H. (2013) Is resilience only skin deep? Rural African Americans' socioeconomic status-related risk and competence in preadolescence and psychological adjustment and allostatic load at age 19. Psychological Science
24(7):1285–93. doi: 10.1177/0956797612471954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Champagne, D. L., Bagot, R. C., van Hasselt, F., Ramakers, G., Meaney, M. J., de Kloet, E. R., Joëls, M. & Krugers, H. (2008) Maternal care and hippocampal plasticity: Evidence for experience-dependent structural plasticity, altered synaptic functioning, and differential responsiveness to glucocorticoids and stress. Journal of Neuroscience
28(23):6037–45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0526-08.2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daskalakis, N. P., Oitzl, M. S., Schachinger, H., Champagne, D. L. & de Kloet, E. R. (2012) Testing the cumulative stress and mismatch hypotheses of psychopathology in a rat model of early-life adversity. Physiology and Behavior
106(5):707–21. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J. & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011) The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
35:1562–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011) Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology
23(1):7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J. & Del Giudice, M. (2014) Beyond allostatic load: Rethinking the role of stress in regulating human development. Development and Psychopathology
26(1):1–20. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankenhuis, W. E. & Del Giudice, M. (2012) When do adaptive developmental mechanisms yield maladaptive outcomes?
Developmental Psychology
48(3):628–42. doi: 10.1037/a0025629; 10.1037/a0025629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankenhuis, W. E. & Panchanathan, K. (2011) Balancing sampling and specialization: An adaptationist model of incremental development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences
278(1724):3558–65. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A. & Beedle, A. S. (2007) Early life events and their consequences for later disease: A life history and evolutionary perspective. American Journal of Human Biology
19(1):1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivy, A. S., Brunson, K. L., Sandman, C. & Baram, T. Z. (2008) Dysfunctional nurturing behavior in rat dams with limited access to nesting material: A clinically relevant model for early-life stress. Neuroscience
154(3):1132–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzawa, C. W. (2005) Fetal origins of developmental plasticity: Are fetal cues reliable predictors of future nutritional environments?
American Journal of Human Biology
17(1):5–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R. & Heim, C. (2009) Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience
10(6):434–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nederhof, E., Ormel, J. & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2014) Mismatch or cumulative stress: The pathway to depression is conditional on attention style. Psychological Science
25(3):684–92. doi: 10.1177/0956797613513473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nederhof, E. & Schmidt, M. V. (2012) Mismatch or cumulative stress: Toward an integrated hypothesis of programming effects. Physiology and Behavior
106(5):691–700. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldehinkel, A. J., Ormel, J., Verhulst, F. C. & Nederhof, E. (2014) Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience. Development and Psychopathology
26(4, Pt.1) 1067–75. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santarelli, S., Lesuis, S. L., Wang, X., Wagner, K. V., Hartmann, J., Labermaier, C., Scharf, S. H., Müller, M. B., Holsboer, F. & Schmidt, M. V. (2014) Evidence supporting the match/mismatch hypothesis of psychiatric disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology
24(6):907–18. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.02.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Hove, D. L. A., Leibold, N. K., Strackx, E., Martinez-Claros, M., Lesch, K. P., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Schruers, K. R. J. & Prickaerts, J. (2014) Prenatal stress and subsequent exposure to chronic mild stress in rats; interdependent effects on emotional behavior and the serotonergic system. European Neuropsychopharmacology
24(4):595–607. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zalosnik, M. I., Pollano, A., Trujillo, V., Suarez, M. M. & Durando, P. E. (2014) Effect of maternal separation and chronic stress on hippocampal-dependent memory in young adult rats: Evidence for the match-mismatch hypothesis. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
17(5):445–50. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.936005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Related commentaries (35)
Adding network approaches to a neurobiological framework of resilience
Animals can tell us more
Appreciating methodological complexity and integrating neurobiological perspectives to advance the science of resilience
Are positive appraisals always adaptive?
Beyond resilience: Positive mental health and the nature of cognitive processes involved in positive appraisals
Broadening the definition of resilience and “reappraising” the use of appetitive motivation
Careful operationalization and assessment are critical for advancing the study of the neurobiology of resilience1
Cognitive trade-offs and the costs of resilience
Do we know how stressed we are?
Does a positive appraisal style work in all stressful situations and for all individuals?
Heterogeneity of cognitive-neurobiological determinants of resilience
Integration of negative experiences: A neuropsychological framework for human resilience
Knowledge and resilience
Personality science, resilience, and posttraumatic growth
Phenotypic programming as a distal cause of resilience
Positive appraisal style: The mental immune system?1
Quantifying resilience: Theoretical or pragmatic for translational research?
Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered
Rediscovering confidence as a mechanism and optimism as a construct
Resilience and psychiatric epidemiology: Implications for a conceptual framework
Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive
Resilience: Mediated by not one but many appraisal mechanisms
Resilience: The role of accurate appraisal, thresholds, and socioenvironmental factors1
Rethinking reappraisal: Insights from affective neuroscience
Social ecological complexity and resilience processes
Stability through variability: Homeostatic plasticity and psychological resilience
The challenges of forecasting resilience
The importance of not only individual, but also community and society factors in resilience in later life
The self in its social context: Why resilience needs company
The temporal dynamics of resilience: Neural recovery as a biomarker
The value of “negative” appraisals for resilience. Is positive (re)appraisal always good and negative always bad?
Toward a translational neuropsychiatry of resilience
What do we know about positive appraisals? Low cognitive cost, orbitofrontal-striatal connectivity, and only short-term bolstering of resilience
When at rest: “Event-free” active inference may give rise to implicit self-models of coping potential
“If you want to understand something, try to change it”: Social-psychological interventions to cultivate resilience
Author response
Advancing empirical resilience research