Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kalisch, Raffael
Baker, Dewleen G.
Basten, Ulrike
Boks, Marco P.
Bonanno, George A.
Brummelman, Eddie
Chmitorz, Andrea
Fernàndez, Guillén
Fiebach, Christian J.
Galatzer-Levy, Isaac
Geuze, Elbert
Groppa, Sergiu
Helmreich, Isabella
Hendler, Talma
Hermans, Erno J.
Jovanovic, Tanja
Kubiak, Thomas
Lieb, Klaus
Lutz, Beat
Müller, Marianne B.
Murray, Ryan J.
Nievergelt, Caroline M.
Reif, Andreas
Roelofs, Karin
Rutten, Bart P. F.
Sander, David
Schick, Anita
Tüscher, Oliver
Diest, Ilse Van
Harmelen, Anne-Laura van
Veer, Ilya M.
Vermetten, Eric
Vinkers, Christiaan H.
Wager, Tor D.
Walter, Henrik
Wessa, Michèle
Wibral, Michael
and
Kleim, Birgit
2017.
The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders.
Nature Human Behaviour,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 11,
p.
784.
Doré, Bruce Pierre
Weber, Jochen
and
Ochsner, Kevin Nicholas
2017.
Neural Predictors of Decisions to Cognitively Control Emotion.
The Journal of Neuroscience,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 10,
p.
2580.
Doré, Bruce
and
Bolger, Niall
2018.
Population- and Individual-Level Changes in Life Satisfaction Surrounding Major Life Stressors.
Social Psychological and Personality Science,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 7,
p.
875.
Grueschow, Marcus
Stenz, Nico
Thörn, Hanna
Ehlert, Ulrike
Breckwoldt, Jan
Brodmann Maeder, Monika
Exadaktylos, Aristomenis K.
Bingisser, Roland
Ruff, Christian C.
and
Kleim, Birgit
2021.
Real-world stress resilience is associated with the responsivity of the locus coeruleus.
Nature Communications,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
Ayash, Sarah
Lingner, Thomas
Ramisch, Anna
Ryu, Soojin
Kalisch, Raffael
Schmitt, Ulrich
and
Müller, Marianne B.
2023.
Fear circuit–based neurobehavioral signatures mirror resilience to chronic social stress in mouse.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 17,
Target article
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Related commentaries (35)
Adding network approaches to a neurobiological framework of resilience
Animals can tell us more
Appreciating methodological complexity and integrating neurobiological perspectives to advance the science of resilience
Are positive appraisals always adaptive?
Beyond resilience: Positive mental health and the nature of cognitive processes involved in positive appraisals
Broadening the definition of resilience and “reappraising” the use of appetitive motivation
Careful operationalization and assessment are critical for advancing the study of the neurobiology of resilience1
Cognitive trade-offs and the costs of resilience
Do we know how stressed we are?
Does a positive appraisal style work in all stressful situations and for all individuals?
Heterogeneity of cognitive-neurobiological determinants of resilience
Integration of negative experiences: A neuropsychological framework for human resilience
Knowledge and resilience
Personality science, resilience, and posttraumatic growth
Phenotypic programming as a distal cause of resilience
Positive appraisal style: The mental immune system?1
Quantifying resilience: Theoretical or pragmatic for translational research?
Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered
Rediscovering confidence as a mechanism and optimism as a construct
Resilience and psychiatric epidemiology: Implications for a conceptual framework
Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive
Resilience: Mediated by not one but many appraisal mechanisms
Resilience: The role of accurate appraisal, thresholds, and socioenvironmental factors1
Rethinking reappraisal: Insights from affective neuroscience
Social ecological complexity and resilience processes
Stability through variability: Homeostatic plasticity and psychological resilience
The challenges of forecasting resilience
The importance of not only individual, but also community and society factors in resilience in later life
The self in its social context: Why resilience needs company
The temporal dynamics of resilience: Neural recovery as a biomarker
The value of “negative” appraisals for resilience. Is positive (re)appraisal always good and negative always bad?
Toward a translational neuropsychiatry of resilience
What do we know about positive appraisals? Low cognitive cost, orbitofrontal-striatal connectivity, and only short-term bolstering of resilience
When at rest: “Event-free” active inference may give rise to implicit self-models of coping potential
“If you want to understand something, try to change it”: Social-psychological interventions to cultivate resilience
Author response
Advancing empirical resilience research