Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:57:19.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge and resilience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Joe Yen-fong Lau
Joe Yen-fong Lau*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. jyflau@hku.hkhttp://philosophy.hku.hk/joelau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kalisch et al. regard a positive appraisal style as the mechanism for promoting resilience. I argue that knowledge can enhance resilience without affecting appraisal style. Furthermore, the relationship between positive appraisals and resilience ought to be mediated by knowledge and is not monotonic. Finally, I raise some questions about how appraisals fit into the dual-process model of the mind.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gruber, J., Mauss, I. B. & Tamir, M. (2011) A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(3):222–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helweg-Larsen, M. & Shepperd, J. A. (2001) Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(1):74–95.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J. & Tversky, A. (1983) Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:20–31.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, D. (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one;s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6):1121–34.Google Scholar