No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The self in its social context: Why resilience needs company
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2015
Abstract
In their target article, Kalisch et al. explicate an appraisal-based model to explain how people bounce back from stress. We posit that for their model, it is crucial to understand the begin-state φ (the “self”) – a state that is shaped by early social thermoregulation and through the social network.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., Vander Drift, L. & Luchies, L. B. (2014) Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science
5:398–406.Google Scholar
Beckes, L. & Coan, J. A. (2011) Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass
5:976–88.Google Scholar
Beckes, L., IJzerman, H. & Tops, M. (2014) Toward a radically embodied neuroscience of attachment and relationships? Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2429522.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. M. & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2010) A disposition to reappraise decreases anterior insula reactivity during anxious anticipation. Biological Psychology
85:383–85.Google Scholar
Ebensperger, L. A. (2001) A review of the evolutionary causes of rodent group-living. Acta Theriologica
46:115–44.Google Scholar
Feldman, R., Rosenthal, Z. & Eidelman, A. I. (2014) Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biological Psychiatry
75:56–64.Google Scholar
Füstös, J., Gramann, K., Herbert, B. M. & Pollatos, O. (2013) On the embodiment of emotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
8(8):911–17. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss089. (First published online August 29, 2012.)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häfner, M. & IJzerman, H. (2011) The face of love: Spontaneous accommodation as social emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
37:1551–63.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J. & Baddeley, A. D. (2012) Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
16:174–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IJzerman, H., Coan, J. A., Wagemans, F. M. A., Missler, M. A., Van Beest, I., Lindenberg, S. & Tops, M. (2014a) A theory of social thermoregulation in human primates. Available online from Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2521717.Google Scholar
IJzerman, H., Häfner, M., Gallucci, M. & Lindenberg, S. (2014b) The social regulation of emotions: The interplay between verbal and nonverbal channels. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jobson, L. & O'Kearney, R. T. (2009) Impact of cultural differences in self on cognitive appraisals in posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
37:249–66.Google Scholar
Koole, S. L., Tops, M., Strübin, S., Bouw, J., Schneider, I. K. & Jostmann, N. B. (2014) The ego fixation hypothesis: Involuntary persistence of self-control. In: The control within: Motivation and its regulation, ed. Forgas, J. P. & Harmon-Jones, E., pp. 95–112. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, S. (2013) Social rationality, self-regulation and well-being: The regulatory significance of needs, goals, and the self. In: Handbook of rational choice social research, ed. Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A. B. & Nee, V., pp. 72–112. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. (1995) Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
69:1203.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. & Florian, V. (1995) Appraisal of and coping with a real-life stressful situation: The contribution of attachment styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
21:406–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V. & Weller, A. (1993) Attachment styles, coping strategies, and posttraumatic psychological distress: The impact of the Gulf War in Israel. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
64:817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review
84(3):231.Google Scholar
Suchecki, D., Mozaffarian, D., Gross, G., Rosenfeld, P. & Levine, S. (1993) Effects of maternal deprivation on the ACTH stress response in the infant rat. Neuroendocrinology
57:204–12.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B. Jr., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2012) Self as functional fiction. Social Cognition
30:415–30.Google Scholar
Target article
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Related commentaries (35)
Adding network approaches to a neurobiological framework of resilience
Animals can tell us more
Appreciating methodological complexity and integrating neurobiological perspectives to advance the science of resilience
Are positive appraisals always adaptive?
Beyond resilience: Positive mental health and the nature of cognitive processes involved in positive appraisals
Broadening the definition of resilience and “reappraising” the use of appetitive motivation
Careful operationalization and assessment are critical for advancing the study of the neurobiology of resilience1
Cognitive trade-offs and the costs of resilience
Do we know how stressed we are?
Does a positive appraisal style work in all stressful situations and for all individuals?
Heterogeneity of cognitive-neurobiological determinants of resilience
Integration of negative experiences: A neuropsychological framework for human resilience
Knowledge and resilience
Personality science, resilience, and posttraumatic growth
Phenotypic programming as a distal cause of resilience
Positive appraisal style: The mental immune system?1
Quantifying resilience: Theoretical or pragmatic for translational research?
Reappraisal and resilience to stress: Context must be considered
Rediscovering confidence as a mechanism and optimism as a construct
Resilience and psychiatric epidemiology: Implications for a conceptual framework
Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive
Resilience: Mediated by not one but many appraisal mechanisms
Resilience: The role of accurate appraisal, thresholds, and socioenvironmental factors1
Rethinking reappraisal: Insights from affective neuroscience
Social ecological complexity and resilience processes
Stability through variability: Homeostatic plasticity and psychological resilience
The challenges of forecasting resilience
The importance of not only individual, but also community and society factors in resilience in later life
The self in its social context: Why resilience needs company
The temporal dynamics of resilience: Neural recovery as a biomarker
The value of “negative” appraisals for resilience. Is positive (re)appraisal always good and negative always bad?
Toward a translational neuropsychiatry of resilience
What do we know about positive appraisals? Low cognitive cost, orbitofrontal-striatal connectivity, and only short-term bolstering of resilience
When at rest: “Event-free” active inference may give rise to implicit self-models of coping potential
“If you want to understand something, try to change it”: Social-psychological interventions to cultivate resilience
Author response
Advancing empirical resilience research