Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:23:52.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Careful operationalization and assessment are critical for advancing the study of the neurobiology of resilience1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Nathan A. Kimbrel  and
Jean C. Beckham
Nathan A. Kimbrel
Affiliation:
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham, NC 27705; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. nathan.kimbrel@va.govjean.beckham@va.gov
Jean C. Beckham
Affiliation:
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham, NC 27705; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. nathan.kimbrel@va.govjean.beckham@va.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors' definition of resilience is too narrow and essentially defines resilience as the absence of psychopathology. Consequently, it is not clear how quantitatively defined resilience differs from quantitatively defined psychopathology according to the authors' definition. We believe the conceptual model would be improved by a broader definition of resilience. There is also a significant need for improved measures of stressor load.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Parts of this commentary were written as an employee of the U.S. Government and such parts are not subject to copyright protection in the United States.

References

Burckhardt, C. S. & Anderson, K. L. (2003) The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1:60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, K. M. & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003) Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety 18(2):76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J. R., Book, S. W., Colket, J. T., Tupler, L. A., Roth, S., David, D., Hertzberg, M., Mellman, T., Beckham, J. C., Smith, R. D., Davison, R. M., Katz, R. & Feldman, M. E. (1997) Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine 27(1):153–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S. & Covi, L. (1973) SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale – Preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 9:13–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002) Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology 6(4):307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbrel, N. A., Evans, L. D., Patel, A. B., Wilson, L. C., Meyer, E. C., Gulliver, S. B. & Morissette, S. B. (2014) The Critical Warzone Experiences (CWE) Scale: Initial psychometric properties and association with PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Psychiatry Research 220(3):1118–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenen, K. C., Duncan, L. E., Liberzon, I. & Ressler, K. J. (2013) From candidate genes to genome-wide association: The challenges and promise of posttraumatic stress disorder genetic studies. Biological Psychiatry 74:634–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenen, K. C., Nugent, N. R. & Amstadter, A. B. (2008) Gene-environment interaction in posttraumatic stress disorder: Review, strategy and new directions for research. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258(2):82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A. & Rutter, M. (2005) Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry 62(5):473–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Üstün, T. B. (2010) Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Windle, G. (2011) What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 21(2):152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar