Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:45:32.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resilience: Mediated by not one but many appraisal mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Patrik N. Juslin*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, SE-75142 Uppsala, Sweden. patrik.juslin@psyk.uu.sehttp://www.psyk.uu.se/forskning/forskargrupper/musicpsychology/

Abstract

Kalisch et al. discuss the causal process underlying stress in terms of a multidimensional goal-appraisal process, but there are several mechanisms at various levels of the brain that use different types of information to guide behavior. Depending on the mechanism, the characteristics of the process are different. Hence, both research and prevention must deal with appraisal in mechanism-specific ways.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frijda, N. H. & Zeelenberg, M. (2001) Appraisal: What is the dependent? In: Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research, ed. Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. & Johnstone, T., pp. 141–55. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izard, C. E. (1993) Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychological Review 100:6890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juslin, P. N. (2013) From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Toward a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews 10:235–66.Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N. & Västfjäll, D. (2008) Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31:559–75.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (1995) Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 46:209–35.Google Scholar