Stroke clinical registries are critical for systems planning, quality improvement, advocacy and informing policy. We describe the methodology and evolution of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network/Ontario Stroke Registry in Canada.

At the launch of the registry in 2001, trained coordinators prospectively identified patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at comprehensive stroke centers across Canada and obtained consent for registry participation and follow-up interviews. From 2003 onward, patients were identified from administrative databases, and consent was waived for data collection on a sample of eligible patients across all hospitals in Ontario and in one site in Nova Scotia. In the most recent data collection cycle, consecutive eligible patients were included across Ontario, but patients with TIA and those seen in the emergency department without admission were excluded.

Between 2001 and 2013, the registry included 110,088 patients. Only 1,237 patients had follow-up interviews, but administrative data linkages allowed for indefinite follow-up of deaths and other measures of health services utilization. After a hiatus, the registry resumed data collection in 2019, with 13,828 charts abstracted to date with a focus on intracranial vascular imaging, identification of intracranial occlusions and treatment with thrombectomy.

The Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network/Ontario Stroke Registry is a large population-based clinical database that has evolved throughout the last two decades to meet contemporary stroke needs. Registry data have been used to monitor stroke quality of care and conduct outcomes research to inform policy.

Acute stroke treatments are highly time-sensitive, with geographical disparities affecting access to care. This study examined the impact of driving distance to the nearest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and rurality on the use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis in Ontario, Canada.

This retrospective cohort study used administrative data to identify adults hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke between 2017 and 2022. Driving time from patients’ residences to the nearest CSC was calculated using the Ontario Road Network File and postal codes. Rurality was categorized using postal codes. Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for baseline differences, estimated the association between driving distance and treatment with thrombectomy (primary outcome) or thrombolysis (secondary outcome). Driving time was modeled as a continuous variable using restricted cubic splines.

Data from 57,678 patients (median age 74 years, IQR 64–83) were analyzed. Increased driving time was negatively associated with thrombectomy in a nonlinear fashion. Patients living 120 minutes from a CSC were 20% less likely to receive thrombectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.62–1.04), and those 240 minutes away were 60% less likely (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.28–0.60). Driving time did not affect thrombolysis rates, even at 240 minutes (aOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.70–1.42). Thrombectomy use was similar in medium urban areas (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.56–1.16) and small towns (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57–1.06) compared to large urban areas.

Thrombolysis access is equitable across Ontario, but thrombectomy access decreases with increased driving distance to CSCs. A multifaceted approach, combining healthcare policy innovation and infrastructure development, is necessary for equitable thrombectomy delivery.

Secondary stroke prevention can reduce subsequent vascular events, mortality and accumulation of disability. Current rates of adherence to secondary stroke prevention indicators are unknown. Our aim was to evaluate secondary stroke prevention care in Ontario, Canada.

A retrospective cohort study using health administrative databases included all adults discharged alive following an ischemic stroke from April 2010 to March 2019. Indicators of secondary stroke prevention, including laboratory testing, physician visits and receipt of routine influenza vaccinations, were evaluated among survivors in the one year following a stroke event. The use of medication was also assessed among individuals over the age of 65 years and within subgroups of stroke survivors with diabetes and atrial fibrillation.

After exclusions, 54,712 individuals (mean age 68.4 years, 45.7% female) survived at least one year following their stroke event. In the 90 days following discharge from the hospital, most individuals (92.8%) were seen by a general practitioner, while 26.2% visited an emergency department. Within the year following discharge, 66.2% and 61.4% were tested for low-density lipoprotein and glycated hemoglobin, respectively, and 39.6% received an influenza vaccine. Among those over the age of 65 years, 85.5% were prescribed a lipid-lowering agent, and 88.7% were prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication. In those with diabetes, 70.3% were prescribed an antihyperglycemic medication, while 84.9% with atrial fibrillation were prescribed an anticoagulant.

Secondary stroke prevention, especially for important laboratory values, remains suboptimal, despite thorough best practice guidelines. Future studies should explore barriers to better secondary stroke care.

We sought to compare whether quality of life (QOL) in patients with subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) who performed normally on a neuropsychological battery significantly differed from those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or non-Alzheimer’s dementia (non-AD) at initial assessment in a Rural and Remote Memory Clinic (RRMC).

610 patients referred to our RRMC between 2004 and 2019 were included in this study. We compared self-reported and caregiver-reported patient QOL scores in those with SCI (n = 166) to those diagnosed with MCI (n = 98), AD (n = 228) and non-AD (n = 118).

Patients with SCI self-reported significantly lower QOL compared to patients with AD. Interestingly, the reverse was seen in caregivers: SCI caregivers rated patient QOL higher than AD caregivers. Patients with SCI also reported lower QOL than patients with MCI. SCI caregivers reported higher patient QOL than their non-AD counterparts. Caregiver-rated patient QOL was higher in those with MCI compared to AD. Patients with MCI self-reported higher QOL scores compared to patients with non-AD dementias. Similarly, MCI caregivers reported higher patient QOL than non-AD caregivers. No other comparisons were statistically significant.

Although they lacked clinically significant cognitive deficits, patients with SCI self-reported significantly lower QOL than patients with MCI and AD. Conversely, caregiver-reported patient QOL was higher for patients with SCI than for patients with AD and non-AD. This shows that SCI seriously impacts QOL. More research is needed on how we can better support patients with SCI to improve their QOL.

Treatment of acute ischemic stroke is highly time dependent, which relies heavily on each hospital’s ability and capacity. Designated stroke centers have been established across Canada, but there is still a divide between urban and rural hospitals. This study aims to understand the similarities and differences in their stroke treatment process workflow, incorporation of best practices and data collection.

Interviews were conducted with clinicians in stroke centers across Canada to identify similarities and differences between provinces and hospital treatment capability. Semi-structured interviews were completed from September 15 to November 3, 2023, with clinicians and stroke coordinators using snowball and purposive sampling techniques. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Fourteen participants were interviewed with representatives from four primary stroke centers and three comprehensive stroke centers across five provinces. Five primary themes were identified: 1) management of resources, 2) standardization of tasks, 3) data collection, 4) tool integration into workflow and 5) teamwork and experience. Participants in primary centers described limited resources to follow the patient through the entire treatment process, reliance on pre-notification times to prospectively search necessary patient information, using software to aid in calculating National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and being more cautious toward treating thrombolytics. Both center types discussed challenges with complete and accurate data collection.

The overall stroke treatment process and information required across primary and comprehensive centers are similar. However, differences occur in the process due to limitations in resources, pre-arrival notification time, completeness and accuracy of data collected and comfort in treating with thrombolytics.

Published guidelines for conducting clinical trials for migraine therapeutics recommend recruiting participants based on disease epidemiology and including sex/gender-based subpopulation analyses. These recommendations aim to improve the quality and generalizability of migraine clinical trials. The aim of this study was to summarize participant demographics in migraine clinical trials for FDA-approved calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeting drugs (receptor antagonists [gepants], CGRP peptide or receptor monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) and assess the use of sex/gender-based subpopulation analyses in these studies.

We conducted a review of industry-sponsored migraine clinical trials for FDA-approved CGRP-targeting medications. Demographic data (sex and/or gender) from phase II or III trials were abstracted, and the use of sex/gender-based analyses was recorded.

Fourteen trials of gepants were included in this analysis. Participants who were identified as females or women were more likely to participate in these trials (87.0 ± 2.2%). Twenty-four trials of CGRP mAbs were reviewed. These studies also reported that participants were predominantly identified as female or women (84.9 ± 2.3%). None of the clinical trials reviewed reported sex/gender-based analyses of their results.

This study suggests that men are underrepresented in migraine CGRP clinical trials. Greater attention to sex and gender is needed in migraine clinical trial design so that they better align with current recommendations made by headache societies and regulatory agencies.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by the inability of dopamine production from amino acids. Therefore, changes in amino acid profile in PD patients are very critical for understanding disease development. Determination of amino acid levels in PD patients with a cumulative approach may enlighten the disease pathophysiology.

A systematic search was performed until February 2023, resulting in 733 articles in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases to evaluate the serum amino acid profile of PD patients. Relevant articles in English with mean/standard deviation values of serum amino acid levels of patients and their healthy controls were included in the meta-analysis.

Our results suggest that valine, proline, ornithine and homocysteine levels were increased, while aspartate, citrulline, lysine and serine levels were significantly decreased in PD patients compared to healthy controls. Homocysteine showed positive correlations with glutamate and ornithine levels. We also analyzed the disease stage parameters: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS III) score, Hoehn–Yahr Stage Score, disease duration and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) of patients. It was observed that LEDD has a negative correlation with arginine levels in patients. UPDRS III score is negatively correlated with phenylalanine levels, and it also tends to show a negative correlation with tyrosine levels. Disease duration tends to be negatively correlated with citrulline levels in PD patients.

This cumulative analysis shows evidence of the relation between the mechanisms underlying amino acid metabolism in PD, which may have a great impact on disease development and new therapeutic strategies.

The Edmonton-based mobile stroke unit (MSU), which transports patients to the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH), enrolled patients in the Intravenous Tenecteplase Compared with Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (AcT) trial. We examined the feasibility of trial enrollment in MSU, its impact on acute stroke workflow metrics and functional outcomes at 90–120 days.

In this post hoc analysis, patients were divided into three groups based on enrollment site: MSU (n = 43), UAH (n = 273) and non-UAH (n = 1261). All patients were enrolled with a deferred consent process. The primary outcome for this analysis was the feasibility of enrollment defined as the proportion of patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) during the study period who were enrolled in the trial. Multiple linear and binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the adjusted effect of the study groups on acute stroke workflow metrics and functional outcomes at 90–120 days.

100% of eligible IVT-treated patients in the MSU during the study period were enrolled in the AcT trial. Covariate-adjusted linear regression showed shorter door-to-needle (17.2 [9.7–24.6] min) and CT-to-needle (10.7 [4.2–17.1] min) times in the MSU compared to UAH and non-UAH sites. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with an excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) at 90–120 days or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 hours between groups.

Enrollment in the AcT trial from the MSU was feasible. MSU-enrolled patients demonstrated faster door-to-needle and CT-to-needle times, resulting in earlier IVT administration and similar rates of symptomatic ICH.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an important treatment for Parkinson’s disease, tremor and dystonia in appropriately selected patients. The Canada Health Act emphasizes equity and “reasonable access to medically necessary hospital and physician services.” How to define “reasonable access” has not been well studied. We aimed to assess access to DBS implantation surgery and to determine the time required from initial assessment through to surgery and which step(s) delay the implantation.

DBS implants from 2016 to 2023 at the University of Alberta were analyzed. The neurologists’ decision to proceed with DBS marks the start of the workup. The time required to see a neurosurgeon, psychiatrist, neuropsychologist and healthcare allies and to receive DBS surgery was assessed. The impact of COVID-19 was studied.

The total time from starting the workup to DBS surgery was 387.76 ± 125.19 days prior to COVID-19, and marked delay occurred during and post-COVID-19 (840.15 ± 165.41 days and 839.78 ± 300.66 days, respectively). Most workups were done within 6 months pre-COVID-19, although a big range existed due to variable factors. The longest delay to surgery was from consent to DBS implantation, owing to a lack of operative time. There has not been a recovery post-pandemic.

Time to DBS implantation surgery from initial decision is lengthy and more than doubled over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. The biggest delay was in the time from consent to implantation surgery, which has not improved despite the pandemic having ended.