Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:29:50.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The practice of everyday life provides supporters and inviters of morally responsible agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Jörg Zinken  and
Vasudevi Reddy
Jörg Zinken
Affiliation:
Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS), 68161 Mannheim, Germany; zinken@ids-mannheim.dehttp://www1.ids-mannheim.de/prag/personal/zinken.html?L=1
Vasudevi Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom PO1 2DY. vasu.reddy@port.ac.ukhttp://www.port.ac.uk/department-of-psychology/research/situated-action-and-communication/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on research from conversation analysis and developmental psychology, we point to the existence of “supporters” of morally responsible agency in everyday interaction: causes of our behavior that we are often unaware of, but that would make good-enough reasons for our actions, were we made aware of them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Rossi, G., Enfield, N. J., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Dingemanse, M., Kendrick, K. & Zinken, J. (2014). Recruitments across languages: A systematic comparison. Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA 2014). University of California at Los Angeles, CA, June 25–29, 2014.Google Scholar
Reddy, V., Liebal, K., Hicks, K., Jonnalagadda, S. & Chintalapuri, B. (2013) The emergent practice of infant compliance. An exploration in two cultures. Developmental Psychology 49(9):1754–62.Google Scholar
Rossi, G. (2012) Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes 49(5):426–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L. & Steensig, J., eds. (2011) The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. (1997) Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, J. (2016) Requesting responsibility: The morality of grammar in Polish and English family interaction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar