Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T10:10:28.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dark side of dialog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Justin J. Couchman ,
Gwenievere A. Birster  and
Mariana V. C. Coutinho
Justin J. Couchman
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Albright College, Reading, PA 19604. jcouchman@albright.edu
Gwenievere A. Birster
Affiliation:
McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA 02478. gbirster@partners.org
Mariana V. C. Coutinho
Affiliation:
College of Natural and Health Sciences, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. mariana.coutinho@zu.ac.ae
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We agree that the self is constructed through a collaborative dialog. But hostile interlocutors could use various cognitive techniques to hijack the dialog, resulting in beliefs, values, and even selves that are out of line with reality. The implications of this problem are dire, but we suggest that increased metacognitive awareness could help guide this process to a truthful conclusion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carruthers, P. (2009) How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:121–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couchman, J. J. (2012) Self-agency in rhesus monkeys. Biology Letters 8(1):39–41. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couchman, J. J., Coutinho, M. V. C., Beran, M. J. & Smith, J. D. (2009) Metacognition is prior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(2):142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couchman, J. J., Miller, N., Zmuda, S. J., Feather, K. & Schwartzmeyer, T. (2016) The instinct fallacy: The metacognition of answering and revising during college exams. Metacognition & Learning 11(2):171–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, M. V. C., Redford, J. S., Church, B. A., Zakrzewski, A. C., Couchman, J. J. & Smith, J. D. (2015) The interplay between uncertainty monitoring and working memory: Can metacognition become automatic? Memory & Cognition 43(7):990–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913) On memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Teachers College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. (2007) An early history of hindsight research. Social Cognition 25:10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajloo, N., Sadeghi, H., Nadinleoi, K. B. & Habibi, Z. (2014) The role of meta-cognition in students' addiction potential tendency. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction 3(1):e9355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D. & Miller, D. T. (2005) Counterfactual thinking and the first instinct fallacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88(5):725–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T. O. & Narens, L. (1990) Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In: The Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, ed. Bower, G., pp. 125–73. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., III & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) Test-enhanced learning. Psychological Science 17(3):249–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I. & Yoon, C. (2007) Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 39:127–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. (1999) Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J. & Beran, M. J. (2012) The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 397:1297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wason, P. (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12(3):129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar