Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:15:59.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the neuroscientist's grandmother in the notebook? Integrated information and reference frames in the search for consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2022

Giuseppe Riva Open the ORCID record for Giuseppe Riva [Opens in a new window]
Giuseppe Riva*
Affiliation:
Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145Milan, Italy. auxo.psylab@auxologico.it Humane Technology Lab, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123Milan, Italy. giuseppe.riva@unicatt.ithttp://www.giusepperiva.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary suggests that the physical substrate of integrated information is dependent on the reference frame used to observe it. Furthermore, it uses a thought experiment – can a neuroscientist, locked in a closed room and connected through Zoom with his grandmother to demonstrate that the consciousness of his grannie is NOT in the PC? – to underline the problems that neglecting reference frames may cause to consciousness research.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e58
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohm, D. (1996). The special theory of relativity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D., & Marletto, C. (2015). Constructor theory of information. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 471(2174), 20140540. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0540CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameroff, S. (2021). “Orch OR” is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(2), 74–76. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2020.1839037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the “Orch OR” theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, J. D. (1978). The uniformly accelerated reference frame. American Journal of Physics, 46(1), 83–89. doi: 10.1119/1.11169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009). Quantum entanglement. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 865–942. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayner, W. G. P., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., Findlay, G., Marchman, R., & Tononi, G. (2018). PyPhi: A toolbox for integrated information theory. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(7), e1006343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215(3), 216–242. doi: 10.2307/25470707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed